Literature DB >> 1278067

New instruments for measuring blood pressure.

D R Labarthe.   

Abstract

The development of the conventional indirect method of blood pressure measurement was essentially complete by 1905, 70 years ago. The method has certain shortcomings, but these can be offset to a large degree by control over conditions of measurement, provision of proper apparatus, and intensive training of observers. Still, there are potential advantages which might be met by an acceptable automated device. An experimental evaluation of five such devices led to rejection of each of them on grounds of inadequate measurement performance, mechanical failures, or both. Only the Random-Zero device (Hawksley) among the instruments tested, gave good performance in comparison with the conventional method and was free of serious mechanical disadvantages. Evaluation of new devices will continue to be of great importance, and proposed guidelines for such studies are reviewed.

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 1278067     DOI: 10.2165/00003495-197600111-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  6 in total

1.  STANDARDISATION OF OBSERVERS IN BLOOD-PRESSURE MEASUREMENT.

Authors:  G ROSE
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1965-03-27       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  A random-zero sphygmomanometer.

Authors:  B M Wright; C F Dore
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1970-02-14       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Evaluation of performance of selected devices for measuring blood pressure.

Authors:  D R Labarthe; C M Hawkins; R D Remington
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1973-09-20       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Criteria for evaluation of automated blood pressure measuring devices for use in hypertensive screening programs. A report of the Committee on Criteria and Methods of the Council on Epidemiology, American Heart Association.

Authors:  M Feinleib; D Labarthe; R Shekelle; L Kuller
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 5.  Hypertension.

Authors:  J G Evans; G Rose
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  1971-01       Impact factor: 4.291

6.  Recommendations for human blood pressure determination by sphygmomanometers.

Authors:  W M Kirkendall; A C Burton; F H Epstein; E D Freis
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1967-12       Impact factor: 29.690

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.