H. A Joy1, J. G Williams. 1. Department of Colorectal Surgery, New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the results of surgery for complex anal fistulas treated by a variety of techniques, in terms of fistula healing, recurrent anal sepsis and effect of surgery on anal continence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included 63 patients with complex fistulas treated between November 1995 and September 1999. A variety of techniques were employed, including short-term loose seton drain (12), long-term loose seton drain (11), cutting seton (17), and rectal advancement flap (19). Outcome was assessed at clinic review and continence was further assessed by detailed questionnaire sent to the patients sometime after surgery. RESULTS: Healing occurred in 9 (75%) patients treated with a short-term, loose drainage seton; 16 (94%) patients treated with a cutting seton and 17 (89%) patients in the rectal advancement flap group. Incontinence reported at clinic review seemed to be more frequent in the advancement flap group. However, a detailed continence questionnaire revealed that 50% of patients reported episodes of incontinence to flatus or liquid after all techniques, which had not been detected at routine clinical review. Incontinence to solids was only reported by two of the patients who had been treated with a cutting seton. CONCLUSIONS: Complex fistulas may be successfully treated by a variety of techniques. Disturbed anal continence following surgery is common and worse than clinic assessment would suggest.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the results of surgery for complex anal fistulas treated by a variety of techniques, in terms of fistula healing, recurrent anal sepsis and effect of surgery on anal continence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included 63 patients with complex fistulas treated between November 1995 and September 1999. A variety of techniques were employed, including short-term loose seton drain (12), long-term loose seton drain (11), cutting seton (17), and rectal advancement flap (19). Outcome was assessed at clinic review and continence was further assessed by detailed questionnaire sent to the patients sometime after surgery. RESULTS: Healing occurred in 9 (75%) patients treated with a short-term, loose drainage seton; 16 (94%) patients treated with a cutting seton and 17 (89%) patients in the rectal advancement flap group. Incontinence reported at clinic review seemed to be more frequent in the advancement flap group. However, a detailed continence questionnaire revealed that 50% of patients reported episodes of incontinence to flatus or liquid after all techniques, which had not been detected at routine clinical review. Incontinence to solids was only reported by two of the patients who had been treated with a cutting seton. CONCLUSIONS:Complex fistulas may be successfully treated by a variety of techniques. Disturbed anal continence following surgery is common and worse than clinic assessment would suggest.
Authors: M E Kelly; H M Heneghan; F D McDermott; G J Nason; C Freeman; S T Martin; D C Winter Journal: Tech Coloproctol Date: 2014-07-03 Impact factor: 3.781
Authors: Andreas Ommer; Alexander Herold; Eugen Berg; Alois Fürst; Marco Sailer; Thomas Schiedeck Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2011-10-21 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: F Y Cheung; N D Appleton; S Rout; R Kalaiselvan; J A Nicholson; A Samad; M Chadwick; R Rajaganeshan Journal: Ann R Coll Surg Engl Date: 2017-10-19 Impact factor: 1.891