Literature DB >> 12780447

Impact of oedema on implant geometry and dosimetry for temporary high dose rate brachytherapy of the prostate.

John D Kiffer1, Wendy A Schumer, Carmel A Mantle, Brett J McKenzie, Malcolm Feigen, George G Quong, Frank M Waterman.   

Abstract

The optimal timing of dosimetry for permanent seed prostatic implants remains contentious given the half life of post-implant oedema resolution. The aim of this study was to establish whether prostatic oedematous change over the duration of a temporary high dose rate (HDR) interstitial brachytherapy (BR) boost would result in significant needle displacement, and whether this change in geometry would influence dosimetry. Two CT scans, one for dosimetric purposes on the day of the implant and the second just prior to implant removal, were obtained for four patients receiving transperineal interstitial prostate brachytherapy. The relative changes in cross-sectional dimensions of the implants were calculated by establishing the change in mean radial distance (MRD) of the needle positions from the geometric centre of the implant for each patient's pair of CT studies. The treatment plan, as calculated from the first CT scan, was used in the second set of CT images to allow a comparison of dose distribution. The percentage change in MRD over the duration of the temporary implants ranged from -1.91% to 1.95%. The maximum change in estimated volume was 3.94%. Dosimetric changes were negligible. In the four cases studied, the degree of oedematous change and consequent displacement of flexiguide needle positions was negligible and did not impact on the dosimetry. The rate and direction of oedematous change can be extremely variable but on the basis of the four cases studied and the results of a larger recent study, it might not be necessary to re-image patients for dosimetric purposes over the duration of a fractionated HDR BT boost to the prostate where flexiguide needles are utilized. Nevertheless, further investigation with larger patient numbers is required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12780447     DOI: 10.1046/j.0004-8461.2003.01146.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Australas Radiol        ISSN: 0004-8461


  4 in total

1.  The impact of prostate volume changes during external-beam irradiation in consequence of HDR brachytherapy in prostate cancer treatment.

Authors:  Markus Karl Alfred Herrmann; Tammo Gsänger; Arne Strauss; Tereza Kertesz; Hendrik A Wolff; Hans Christiansen; Hilke Vorwerk; Clemens Friedrich Hess; Andrea Hille
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Edema worsens target coverage in high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy of mobile tongue cancer: a report of two cases.

Authors:  Ken Yoshida; Hideya Yamazaki; Tadayuki Kotsuma; Hironori Akiyama; Tadashi Takenaka; Koji Masui; Yasuo Yoshioka; Yasuo Uesugi; Taiju Shimbo; Nobuhiko Yoshikawa; Hiroto Yoshioka; Takumi Arika; Eiichi Tanaka; Yoshifumi Narumi
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2017-01-16

3.  Prostate volume and implant configuration during 48 hours of temporary prostate brachytherapy: limited effect of oedema.

Authors:  Anna M Dinkla; Bradley R Pieters; Kees Koedooder; Niek van Wieringen; Rob van der Laarse; Arjan Bel
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 3.481

4.  A new implant device to prevent edema-associated underdosage in high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy of mobile tongue cancer.

Authors:  Ken Yoshida; Tadayuki Kotsuma; Hironori Akiyama; Hideya Yamazaki; Tadashi Takenaka; Koji Masui; Yutaka Tsujimoto; Naoya Murakami; Yasuo Uesugi; Taiju Shimbo; Nobuhiko Yoshikawa; Hiroto Yoshioka; Mio Nakata; Takumi Arika; Yuji Takaoka; Eiichi Tanaka; Nikolaos Tselis
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2019-12-25
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.