Literature DB >> 12780424

Selective iron supplementation based on serum ferritin values early in pregnancy: are the Norwegian recommendations satisfactory?

Berit Sandstad1, Berit Borch-Iohnsen, Grete Maria Andersen, Birgit Dahl-Jørgensen, Ingrid Frøysa, Cecilia Leslie, Marianne Hanneborg Aas, Tørris Rolf Eig, Svend Øyvind Sandem.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aims of the present study were to evaluate the recommendations by comparing compliance and adequacy of iron status at 6 weeks postpartum between one group given advice only and one group given advice plus iron supplement. In the latter group the efficacies of two iron preparations of different strengths and types were compared.
METHODS: Ninety-three women had been given advice only (Group I) and were enrolled in the project at 6 weeks postpartum. Two hundred and thirty-three women enrolled at their second antenatal visit and were given advice plus iron supplement; those with s-ferritin <60 microg/L were randomized to a daily dose of 1) 60 mg Fe2+ (Ferromax) or 2) 3.6 mg heme iron plus 24 mg Fe2+ (Hemofer), and started taking the supplement at once if s-ferritin <20 microg/L or at 20 weeks if 20-60 microg/L. In addition to hemoglobin as routine, s-ferritin was measured in all the women at 6 weeks postpartum.
RESULTS: At 6 weeks postpartum median s-ferritin was 28 and 34 microg/L in Groups I and II, respectively, and a significantly higher mean s-ferritin (46.5 vs. 37.3 microg/L; p < 0.05) was found in women taking the highest dose. There were no correlations between s-ferritin in early pregnancy and at 6 weeks postpartum. Peripartum blood loss was the main indicator for iron status at 6 weeks postpartum.
CONCLUSION: Iron supplementation based on iron status early in pregnancy, with 60 mg ferrous iron or 27 mg iron containing heme, resulted in adequate iron stores at 6 weeks postpartum among 75% or 70% of the women, respectively. However, 6 weeks were not sufficient to rebuild iron stores in women with large peripartum blood loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12780424     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2003.00139.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  5 in total

Review 1.  Intermittent oral iron supplementation during pregnancy.

Authors:  Juan Pablo Peña-Rosas; Luz Maria De-Regil; Therese Dowswell; Fernando E Viteri
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-07-11

Review 2.  Daily oral iron supplementation during pregnancy.

Authors:  Juan Pablo Peña-Rosas; Luz Maria De-Regil; Maria N Garcia-Casal; Therese Dowswell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-07-22

Review 3.  Daily oral iron supplementation during pregnancy.

Authors:  Juan Pablo Peña-Rosas; Luz Maria De-Regil; Therese Dowswell; Fernando E Viteri
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-12-12

Review 4.  Intermittent oral iron supplementation during pregnancy.

Authors:  Juan Pablo Peña-Rosas; Luz Maria De-Regil; Heber Gomez Malave; Monica C Flores-Urrutia; Therese Dowswell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-10-19

5.  Health effects of different dietary iron intakes: a systematic literature review for the 5th Nordic Nutrition Recommendations.

Authors:  Magnus Domellöf; Inga Thorsdottir; Ketil Thorstensen
Journal:  Food Nutr Res       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 3.894

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.