Literature DB >> 12778773

Implausible research: how much is enough?

Stephen Barrett.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2003        PMID： 12778773     DOI： 10.1007/bf03040319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr        ISSN： 0043-5325            Impact factor:   1.704


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

Review 1.  The efficacy of "distant healing": a systematic review of randomized trials.

Authors:  J A Astin; E Harkness; E Ernst
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2000-06-06       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  A randomized double-blind study of the effect of distant healing in a population with advanced AIDS. Report of a small scale study.

Authors:  F Sicher; E Targ; D Moore; H S Smith
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1998-12

3.  A randomized, controlled trial of the effects of remote, intercessory prayer on outcomes in patients admitted to the coronary care unit.

Authors:  W S Harris; M Gowda; J W Kolb; C P Strychacz; J L Vacek; P G Jones; A Forker; J H O'Keefe; B D McCallister
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1999-10-25

4.  Positive therapeutic effects of intercessory prayer in a coronary care unit population.

Authors:  R C Byrd
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 0.954

5.  A close look at therapeutic touch.

Authors:  L Rosa; E Rosa; L Sarner; S Barrett
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-04-01       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  Distant healing--an "update" of a systematic review.

Authors:  Edzard Ernst
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2003-04-30       Impact factor: 2.275
  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Is there enough rationale in randomised controlled trials on distant healing?

Authors:  Georg Röggla; Sandra Fortunat
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 1.704
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.