Literature DB >> 12778555

Size-dependent selection on arrival times in sticklebacks: why small males arrive first.

Ulrika Candolin1, Heinz-Rudolf Voigt.   

Abstract

Studies on arrival time to breeding areas show that high-quality males usually arrive first and gain the highest reproductive success. This is generally assumed to be due to phenotype-dependent costs and benefits of early arrival. We show that the opposite arrival order can occur, probably due to selection on poor-quality males to increase their chances of reproduction. In a fish species, the threespine stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus, small males arrived before larger males at the breeding grounds. Early arrival was costly because predation risk was at its highest at the start of the season and early territory establishment was selected against, as demonstrated by selection coefficients for territory maintenance and hatching success. Large males probably postponed arrival until females were available to decrease predation risk costs and increase offspring production. An experimental study showed that a delay in arrival of large males does not decrease their probability of reproduction, because large males are able to take over nest sites from small males. Small males, on the other hand, are less likely to establish territories in competition with large males but can pay the costs of early arrival in exchange for the benefit of access to territories. Thus, whereas natural selection favors later arrival, sexual selection through competition for breeding territories favors early arrival in small, competitively inferior males. This results in the benefits of early arrival depending on the competitive ability of the male, which favors size-dependent optimal arrival times.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12778555     DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00297.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  7 in total

1.  Indirect effects of human-induced environmental change on offspring production mediated by behavioural responses.

Authors:  Ulrika Candolin; Anne Nieminen; Johanna Nyman
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Early exposure to nonlethal predation risk by size-selective predators increases somatic growth and decreases size at adulthood in three-spined sticklebacks.

Authors:  A M Bell; N J Dingemanse; S J Hankison; M B W Langenhof; K Rollins
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2011-03-07       Impact factor: 2.411

3.  Assessment during aggressive contests between male jumping spiders.

Authors:  Damian O Elias; Michael M Kasumovic; David Punzalan; Maydianne C B Andrade; Andrew C Mason
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.844

4.  Declining coastal piscivore populations in the Baltic Sea: Where and when do sticklebacks matter?

Authors:  Pär Byström; Ulf Bergström; Alexander Hjälten; Sofie Ståhl; David Jonsson; Jens Olsson
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 5.129

5.  Field evidence challenges the often-presumed relationship between early male maturation and female-biased sexual size dimorphism.

Authors:  Marie-Claire Chelini; Eileen Hebets
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 6.  Ecological connectivity of the marine protected area network in the Baltic Sea, Kattegat and Skagerrak: Current knowledge and management needs.

Authors:  Charlotte Berkström; Lovisa Wennerström; Ulf Bergström
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 5.129

7.  Should attractive males sneak: the trade-off between current and future offspring.

Authors:  Ulrika Candolin; Leon Vlieger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.