BACKGROUND: In the rural setting, long distances may necessitate that a patient undergo emergency laparotomy before transfer to a regional trauma center for definitive management. The purpose of this study was to review the experience of three regional trauma centers with such treated patients. METHODS: This study was a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent emergency laparotomy for trauma before transfer, identified from the respective databases of participating centers over a 6-year period. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients met the study criteria. Twenty-six (46%) were transferred primarily for management of the abdominal injury, and 14 of these patients (25% overall) underwent damage control procedures. Overall survival was 82%. Logistic regression demonstrated that transfer for treatment of the extra-abdominal injury was the only significant predictor of survival (odds ratio, 34.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.80-655.24). CONCLUSION: Although patients undergoing laparotomy who were subsequently transferred for management of abdominal injury have reasonable outcome, patients transferred primarily for management of extra-abdominal injury seem to have a survival advantage.
BACKGROUND: In the rural setting, long distances may necessitate that a patient undergo emergency laparotomy before transfer to a regional trauma center for definitive management. The purpose of this study was to review the experience of three regional trauma centers with such treated patients. METHODS: This study was a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent emergency laparotomy for trauma before transfer, identified from the respective databases of participating centers over a 6-year period. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients met the study criteria. Twenty-six (46%) were transferred primarily for management of the abdominal injury, and 14 of these patients (25% overall) underwent damage control procedures. Overall survival was 82%. Logistic regression demonstrated that transfer for treatment of the extra-abdominal injury was the only significant predictor of survival (odds ratio, 34.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.80-655.24). CONCLUSION: Although patients undergoing laparotomy who were subsequently transferred for management of abdominal injury have reasonable outcome, patients transferred primarily for management of extra-abdominal injury seem to have a survival advantage.
Authors: Matthijs H van Gool; Georgios F Giannakopoulos; Leo M G Geeraedts; Elly S M de Lange-de Klerk; Wietse P Zuidema Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2014-12-23 Impact factor: 3.445