Literature DB >> 12777033

US trends in refractive surgery: 2002 ISRS survey.

Richard J Duffey1, David Leaming.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the latest trends in refractive surgery in the United States.
METHODS: The full U.S. membership of the International Society of Refractive Surgery (ISRS) (approximately 900 members) was mailed the 2002 refractive surgery survey dealing with volumes, types, preferences of refractive surgery performed, and use of emerging technology.
RESULTS: Questions regarding RK, AK, PRK, LASIK, LASEK, intracorneal ring segments (ICRS), laser thermal keratoplasty (LTK), conductive keratoplasty (CK), phakic intraocular lenses (PIOL), and clear lens extractions (CLE) were examined in the survey. Procedure preference for low, moderate, and high myopia, and hyperopia, were compared with the results from the surveys of the previous 5 years. Preference for unilateral versus bilateral same-day surgery, laser type, and microkeratome choice were also compared with the survey data from previous years. Incidence and frequency of co-management of refractive surgery patients were compared with 1999-2001 data. New questions regarding pupil measurement/documentation, wavefront aberrometry, and custom ablations were incorporated into the 2002 survey.
CONCLUSIONS: As refractive surgery grows in the mainstream of ophthalmology, trends and changes in the United States continue to be elucidated by this professional organization survey. LASIK continues to dominate for refractive errors between -10.00 to +3.00 D. LASIK, LASEK, CLE, PIOL, and CK appear to have bright futures, whereas, RK, ICR, and LTK are on the decline. VISX continues to be utilized 2:1 over all other lasers combined, and instrumentation pupillometry is preferred 2:1 over pupil gauge cards. Currently, wavefront aberrometry and custom ablations are minimally employed but appear poised to be the wave of the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12777033     DOI: 10.3928/1081-597X-20030501-14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  10 in total

Review 1.  Interventions to slow progression of myopia in children.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Walline; Kristina Lindsley; Satyanarayana S Vedula; Susan A Cotter; Donald O Mutti; J Daniel Twelker
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-12-07

2.  The Changes of Tear Status after Conventional and Wavefront-Guided IntraLASIK.

Authors:  Say Kiang Foo; Sharanjeet Kaur; Faudziah Abd Manan; Aloysius Joseph Low
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2011-04

3.  Intraoperative and early postoperative flap-related complications of laser in situ keratomileusis using two types of Moria microkeratomes.

Authors:  Yunus Karabela; Orkun Muftuoglu; Ibrahim Gokhan Gulkilik; Mehmet Selim Kocabora; Mustafa Ozsutcu
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Refractive correction with multifocal intraocular lenses after radial keratotomy.

Authors:  Bárbara Martín-Escuer; José F Alfonso; Luis Fernández-Vega-Cueto; Alberto Domíngez-Vicent; Robert Montés-Micó
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Subjective pain, visual recovery and visual quality after LASIK, EpiLASIK (flap off) and APRK - a consecutive, non-randomized study.

Authors:  Christos Skevas; Toam Katz; Lars Wagenfeld; Gisbert Richard; Stephan Linke
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation in high myopia.

Authors:  Asaad A Ghanem; Hosam M El-Sayed
Journal:  Oman J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-09

7.  Interventions to slow progression of myopia in children.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Walline; Kristina B Lindsley; S Swaroop Vedula; Susan A Cotter; Donald O Mutti; Sueko M Ng; J Daniel Twelker
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-01-13

8.  Comparison of microkeratome assisted sub-Bowman keratomileusis with photorefractive keratectomy.

Authors:  Talal A Althomali
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-01-29

9.  Clear lens extraction for patients who are unfit for laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis and implantable contact lenses in central Indian population.

Authors:  Rajesh Subhash Joshi
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 10.  Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) versus laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for correcting myopia.

Authors:  Jocelyn Kuryan; Anjum Cheema; Roy S Chuck
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-02-15
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.