Literature DB >> 12776004

Registered nurse-administered propofol sedation for upper endoscopy and colonoscopy: Why? When? How?

Douglas K Rex1, Christine A Overley, John Walker.   

Abstract

Propofol for sedation during gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures has been associated with improved patient satisfaction relative to combinations of meperidine and midazolam. Delivery of propofol by registered nurses has been shown to be more cost-effective than administration by anesthesiologists or nurse anesthetists. Here, the authors review their experience with nurse-administered propofol sedation (NAPS) at their institutions (a hospital endoscopy unit in a tertiary medical center and an ambulatory surgery center). Endoscopic procedures for which NAPS is (or is not) recommended are listed, and a profile of patients for whom NAPS is contraindicated is given. Steps toward the development of programs and acquisition of training in NAPS are recommended; these include determining what state, local, and institutional laws apply to propofol administration; developing a written protocol; and instituting a training program that proceeds from observation to supervised administration to independent administration of propofol, with appropriate monitoring of safety records. Experience with NAPS using bolus titration (dosage, timing, coadministration with other agents) is detailed, and proper patient monitoring is discussed. NAPS is in its infancy, but this method of sedation shows considerable promise for improving patient satisfaction with, and thereby the reputation of, endoscopic procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12776004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Gastroenterol Disord        ISSN: 1533-001X


  8 in total

1.  Sedation levels during propofol administration for outpatient colonoscopies.

Authors:  Michael A E Ramsay; Kate B Newman; Robert M Jacobson; Charles T Richardson; Lindsay Rogers; Bertrand J Brown; H A Tillmann Hein; Edward B De Vol; Yahya A Daoud
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2014-01

2.  Propofol use for sedation during endoscopy in adults: a Canadian Association of Gastroenterology position statement.

Authors:  Michael F Byrne; Naoki Chiba; Harminder Singh; Daniel C Sadowski
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.522

3.  Computer-Assisted Propofol Sedation for Esophagogastroduodenoscopy Is Effective, Efficient, and Safe.

Authors:  Otto S Lin; Danielle La Selva; Richard A Kozarek; Deborah Tombs; Wade Weigel; Ryan Beecher; Johannes Koch; Susan McCormick; Michael Chiorean; Fred Drennan; Michael Gluck; Nanda Venu; Michael Larsen; Andrew Ross
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Bringing top-end endoscopy to regional australia: hurdles and benefits.

Authors:  J Van Den Bogaerde; D Sorrentino
Journal:  Diagn Ther Endosc       Date:  2012-09-09

Review 5.  Endoscopic sedation: from training to performance.

Authors:  Tae Hoon Lee; Chang Kyun Lee
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2014-03-31

Review 6.  Sedation for routine gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: a review on efficacy, safety, efficiency, cost and satisfaction.

Authors:  Otto S Lin
Journal:  Intest Res       Date:  2017-10-23

7.  Monitored anesthesia care (MAC) sedation: clinical utility of fospropofol.

Authors:  Eric A Harris; David A Lubarsky; Keith A Candiotti
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 2.423

8.  Cardiopulmonary safety of propofol versus midazolam/meperidine sedation for colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study.

Authors:  Bunyamin Gurbulak; Sinan Uzman; Esin Kabul Gurbulak; Yasar Gokhan Gul; Mehmet Toptas; Sevim Baltali; Osman Anil Savas
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 0.611

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.