Literature DB >> 12775786

Cervical screening and health inequality in England in the 1990s.

D Baker1, E Middleton.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: s: To examine changing inequality in the coverage of cervical screening and its relation to organisational aspects of primary care and to inequality in cervical cancer incidence and mortality.
DESIGN: Retrospective time trends analysis (1991-2001) of screening coverage and cervical cancer incidence and mortality in England.
SETTING: The 99 district health authorities in England, as defined by 1999 boundaries were used to create a time series of incidence and mortality rates from cervical cancer per 100 000 population. A subset of 60 district health authorities were used to construct a time series of screening coverage data and GP and practice characteristics. Health authorities were categorised into one of three "deprivation" groups using the Townsend Deprivation Index. PARTICIPANTS: Women aged <35 and 35-64 were selected from health authority populations as the main focus of the study.
RESULTS: Cervical cancer screening coverage was consistently higher in affluent areas from 1991-9 but ratio rates of inequality between affluent and deprived health authorities narrowed over time. The increase in coverage in deprived areas was most closely associated with an increase in the number of practice nurses. Cervical cancer incidence and mortality rates were consistently higher in deprived health authorities, but inequality decreased. Screening coverage and cervical cancer rates were highly negatively correlated in deprived health authorities.
CONCLUSION: A primary health care intervention such as an organised programme of cervical screening can contribute to reducing inequality in population health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12775786      PMCID: PMC1732483          DOI: 10.1136/jech.57.6.417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  27 in total

1.  Explaining trends in inequities: evidence from Brazilian child health studies.

Authors:  C G Victora; J P Vaughan; F C Barros; A C Silva; E Tomasi
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-09-23       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  How complete and accurate are cancer registrations notified by the National Health Service Central Register for England and Wales?

Authors:  H O Dickinson; J A Salotti; P J Birch; M M Reid; A Malcolm; L Parker
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Measuring the quality of medical care. A clinical method.

Authors:  D D Rutstein; W Berenberg; T C Chalmers; C G Child; A P Fishman; E B Perrin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1976-03-11       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Some international comparisons of mortality amenable to medical intervention.

Authors:  J R Charlton; R Velez
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-02-01

Review 5.  Health inequalities and the health of the poor: what do we know? What can we do?

Authors:  D R Gwatkin
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 9.408

6.  Predictions of cervical cancer incidence and mortality in England and Wales.

Authors:  V Beral; M Booth
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-03-01       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Sexual behaviour in Britain: partnerships, practices, and HIV risk behaviours.

Authors:  A M Johnson; C H Mercer; B Erens; A J Copas; S McManus; K Wellings; K A Fenton; C Korovessis; W Macdowall; K Nanchahal; S Purdon; J Field
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Changing patterns of cervical cancer rates.

Authors:  G J Draper; G A Cook
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1983-08-20

9.  Inequalities in health in the city of Bristol: a preliminary review of statistical evidence.

Authors:  P Townsend; D Simpson; N Tibbs
Journal:  Int J Health Serv       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.663

10.  Survey of population coverage in cervical cancer screening in the Oxford region.

Authors:  A Coulter; A Baldwin
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1987-10
View more
  48 in total

1.  The quality and outcomes framework of the GMS contract: a quiet evolution for 2006.

Authors:  Helen Lester; Deborah J Sharp; F Dr Hobbs; Mayur Lakhani
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Future of quality measurement.

Authors:  Helen Lester; Martin Roland
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-12-01

3.  The Quality and Outcomes Framework: too early for a final verdict.

Authors:  Martin Roland
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Decomposing income-related inequality in cervical screening in 67 countries.

Authors:  Brittany McKinnon; Sam Harper; Spencer Moore
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 3.380

5.  Socioeconomic status and cancer screening in Japanese males: Large inequlaity in middle-aged and urban residents.

Authors:  Yoshiharu Fukuda; Keiko Nakamura; Takehito Takano; Hiroyuki Nakao; Hirohisa Imai
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.674

6.  Deprivation and quality of primary care services: evidence for persistence of the inverse care law from the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework.

Authors:  G McLean; M Sutton; B Guthrie
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  Coverage of Jade Goody's cervical cancer in UK newspapers: a missed opportunity for health promotion?

Authors:  Shona Hilton; Kate Hunt
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Uptake in cancer screening programmes: a priority in cancer control.

Authors:  D P Weller; C Campbell
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Inequalities in colorectal cancer screening participation in the first round of the national screening programme in England.

Authors:  C von Wagner; A Good; D Wright; B Rachet; A Obichere; S Bloom; J Wardle
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Newsprint media representations of the introduction of the HPV vaccination programme for cervical cancer prevention in the UK (2005-2008).

Authors:  Shona Hilton; Kate Hunt; Mairi Langan; Helen Bedford; Mark Petticrew
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 4.634

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.