Literature DB >> 12775677

Pharmacodynamic activity of azithromycin against macrolide-susceptible and -resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae simulating clinically achievable free serum, epithelial lining fluid and middle ear fluid concentrations.

George G Zhanel1, Mel DeCorby, Ayman Noreddin, Chris Mendoza, Andrew Cumming, Kim Nichol, Aleksandra Wierzbowski, Daryl J Hoban.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The association between macrolide resistance mechanisms and bacteriological eradication of Streptococcus pneumoniae remains poorly studied. The present study, using an in vitro pharmacodynamic model, assessed azithromycin activity against macrolide-susceptible and -resistant S. pneumoniae simulating clinically achievable free serum (S), epithelial lining fluid (ELF) and middle ear fluid (MEF) concentrations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two macrolide-susceptible [PCR-negative for both mef(A) and erm(B)] and six macrolide-resistant [five mef(A)-positive/erm(B)-negative displaying various degrees of macrolide resistance and one mef(A)-negative/erm(B)-positive] S. pneumoniae were tested. Azithromycin was modelled simulating a dosage of 500 mg/250 mg by mouth, once a day [free S: maximum concentration (Cmax) 0.2 mg/L, t1/2 68 h; free ELF Cmax 1.0 mg/L, t1/2 68 h] and 10 mg/kg by mouth, once a day (free MEF: Cmax 1.0 mg/L, t1/2 68 h) using a one compartment model. Starting inocula were 1 x 10(6) cfu/mL in Mueller-Hinton broth with 2% lysed horse blood. Sampling at 0, 2, 4, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h assessed the extent of bacterial killing (decrease in log10 cfu/mL versus initial inoculum).
RESULTS: Free azithromycin concentrations in serum, ELF and MEF simulating time above the MIC (T > MIC) of 100% [area under the curve to MIC (AUC0-24/MIC] > or = 36.7] were bactericidal (> or = 3 log10 killing) at 24 and 48 h versus macrolide-susceptible S. pneumoniae. Against macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae, free serum concentrations providing T > MIC of 0% or AUC0-24/MIC < or = 1.1 demonstrated no bacterial inhibition followed by regrowth at 24 and 48 h, whereas free ELF and MEF providing T > MIC of 0% or AUC0-24/MIC of 4.6 produced a bacteriostatic (0.2-0.5 log10 killing at 24 h) effect with a mef(A) strain with an azithromycin MIC of 2 mg/L. Against mef(A)-positive S. pneumoniae strains with azithromycin MICs > or = 4 mg/L, no bacterial killing occurred at any time point and rapid regrowth was observed simulating ELF or MEF T > MIC of 0% or AUC0-24/MIC < or = 2.3.
CONCLUSION: Azithromycin serum, ELF and MEF concentrations rapidly eradicated macrolide-susceptible S. pneumoniae but did not eradicate macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae regardless of resistance phenotype.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12775677     DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkg278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  10 in total

1.  Azithromycin Pharmacodynamics against Persistent Haemophilus influenzae in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Authors:  Brian T Tsuji; James Fisher; Raheal Boadi-Yeboah; Patricia N Holden; Sanjay Sethi; Melinda M Pettigrew; Timothy F Murphy
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Penetration of anti-infective agents into pulmonary epithelial lining fluid: focus on antibacterial agents.

Authors:  Keith A Rodvold; Jomy M George; Liz Yoo
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Pharmacodynamic activity of telithromycin at simulated clinically achievable free-drug concentrations in serum and epithelial lining fluid against efflux (mefE)-producing macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae for which telithromycin MICs vary.

Authors:  George G Zhanel; Christel Johanson; Nancy Laing; Tamiko Hisanaga; Aleksandra Wierzbowski; Daryl J Hoban
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Prevalence and antibacterial susceptibility of mef(A)-positive macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae over 4 years (2000 to 2004) of the PROTEKT US Study.

Authors:  David J Farrell; Thomas M File; Stephen G Jenkins
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  In vitro pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of S-013420 against Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Homma; Toshihiko Hori; Merime Ohshiro; Hideki Maki; Yoshinori Yamano; Jingoro Shimada; Shogo Kuwahara
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Intrapulmonary pharmacokinetics of S-013420, a novel bicyclolide antibacterial, in healthy Japanese subjects.

Authors:  Hidetoshi Furuie; Yutaka Saisho; Takayoshi Yoshikawa; Jingoro Shimada
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Influence of azithromycin and clarithromycin on macrolide susceptibility of viridans streptococci from the oral cavity of healthy volunteers.

Authors:  M Eisenblätter; C Klaus; M W R Pletz; H Orawa; H Hahn; J Wagner; H Lode
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 8.  Hidden epidemic of macrolide-resistant pneumococci.

Authors:  Keith P Klugman; John R Lonks
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 6.883

9.  PK-PD Modeling and Optimal Dosing Regimen of Acetylkitasamycin against Streptococcus suis in Piglets.

Authors:  Anxiong Huang; Feng Mao; Lingli Huang; Shuyu Xie; Yuanhu Pan; Wei Qu; Guyue Cheng; Zhenli Liu; Zonghui Yuan; Dapeng Peng; Haihong Hao
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-21

Review 10.  Predicting Antimicrobial Activity at the Target Site: Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Indices versus Time-Kill Approaches.

Authors:  Wisse van Os; Markus Zeitlinger
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-04
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.