Hans Peter Söndergaard1, Solvig Ekblad, Töres Theorell. 1. National Swedish Institute for Psychosocial Factors and Health, PO Box 230, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden. hans.peter.sondergaard@phs.ki.se
Abstract
UNLABELLED: A screening procedure (The Health Leaflet; HL) to assist social workers in finding subjects with possible post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in recently resettled refugees is presented. It is compared with two established self-rating instruments, the Harvard Trauma Questionnaire (HTQ) and Impact of Event Scale-22 (IES-22), as well as structured clinical interview. AIM: To validate the screening interview and the rating scales in comparison to a clinical assessment for PTSD, and examine the feasibility of lay screening for PTSD. FINDINGS: The Health Screening Interview with a cut-off value of 10 points identified cases with fully developed PTSD with both sensitivity and specificity about 0.7. Only two items--difficulties concentrating and having been exposed to torture--contributed to the discriminatory performance of the HL interview. In the HTQ symptom subscale, emotional detachment and a feeling of going mad contributed to the discriminatory performance. In the IES-22, recurring strong affects about the events, as well as intrusive memories, were the items with the highest canonical correlation coefficients. In the HL, the single screening question about difficulties concentrating identified 31/32 individuals diagnosed with PTSD in this group, with a relative risk of 24. CONCLUSIONS: A mental health screening procedure during refugee reception performed by lay persons is clearly feasible and can assist in identifying subjects with trauma-related healthcare needs, thus leading to more realistic demands in refugee reception.
UNLABELLED: A screening procedure (The Health Leaflet; HL) to assist social workers in finding subjects with possible post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in recently resettled refugees is presented. It is compared with two established self-rating instruments, the Harvard Trauma Questionnaire (HTQ) and Impact of Event Scale-22 (IES-22), as well as structured clinical interview. AIM: To validate the screening interview and the rating scales in comparison to a clinical assessment for PTSD, and examine the feasibility of lay screening for PTSD. FINDINGS: The Health Screening Interview with a cut-off value of 10 points identified cases with fully developed PTSD with both sensitivity and specificity about 0.7. Only two items--difficulties concentrating and having been exposed to torture--contributed to the discriminatory performance of the HL interview. In the HTQ symptom subscale, emotional detachment and a feeling of going mad contributed to the discriminatory performance. In the IES-22, recurring strong affects about the events, as well as intrusive memories, were the items with the highest canonical correlation coefficients. In the HL, the single screening question about difficulties concentrating identified 31/32 individuals diagnosed with PTSD in this group, with a relative risk of 24. CONCLUSIONS: A mental health screening procedure during refugee reception performed by lay persons is clearly feasible and can assist in identifying subjects with trauma-related healthcare needs, thus leading to more realistic demands in refugee reception.
Authors: Anne M de Graaff; Pim Cuijpers; Mariska Leeflang; Irene Sferra; Jana R Uppendahl; Ralph de Vries; Marit Sijbrandij Journal: Glob Ment Health (Camb) Date: 2021-11-23
Authors: Monica Löfvander; Andreas Rosenblad; Tony Wiklund; Halina Bennström; Jerzy Leppert Journal: Scand J Public Health Date: 2014-09-23 Impact factor: 3.021
Authors: Viktoria Zander; Henrik Eriksson; Kyllike Christensson; Maria Müllersdorf Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2015-09-25 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Olivia Magwood; Azaad Kassam; Dorsa Mavedatnia; Oreen Mendonca; Ammar Saad; Hafsa Hasan; Maria Madana; Dominique Ranger; Yvonne Tan; Kevin Pottie Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-03-16 Impact factor: 3.390