Literature DB >> 12773745

Population-based pharmacoeconomic model for adopting capecitabine/docetaxel combination treatment for anthracycline-pretreated metastatic breast cancer.

Shailendra Verma1, A Lane Ilersich.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To model the cost-effectiveness of adopting capecitabine/docetaxel combination therapy in place of single-agent taxane therapy for women in the province of Ontario, Canada, receiving treatment for anthracycline-pretreated metastatic breast cancer.
METHODS: Clinical effectiveness and economic data were combined in a population model, from the perspective of a universal health care system. Estimates of clinical effectiveness and medical resource utilization were derived prospectively during a phase III randomized controlled trial comparing single-agent docetaxel with capecitabine/docetaxel combination therapy. Population data were obtained from the Cancer Care Ontario Registry and provincial prescription claims data.
RESULTS: During 1999-2000, 542 patients were eligible for taxane monotherapy. As capecitabine/docetaxel treatment confers a median 3-month survival benefit compared with docetaxel monotherapy, the projected survival gain in these patients was 136 life-years. The results of the cost-effectiveness analysis demonstrate that the survival benefit provided by the addition of capecitabine to single-agent docetaxel is afforded at a small incremental cost of Canadian $3,691 per life-year gained. Hospitalization costs for treatment of adverse events were less for patients receiving capecitabine/docetaxel combination therapy than for those receiving docetaxel monotherapy. The results were robust for adjustments in treatment costs and adverse effects costs.
CONCLUSION: Due to its 3-month survival gain and small incremental treatment cost, capecitabine/docetaxel is judged to be a highly cost-effective treatment in anthracycline-pretreated advanced breast cancer. From the perspective of the Ontario health care system, the addition of capecitabine to docetaxel in this patient population is a clinically appropriate and economically acceptable treatment strategy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12773745     DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.8-3-232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  5 in total

1.  Feasibility of using administrative claims data for cost-effectiveness analysis of a clinical trial.

Authors:  Andre Konski; Mythreyi Bhargavan; Jean Owen; Rebecca Paulus; Jay Cooper; Karen K Fu; Kian Ang; Deborah Watkins-Bruner
Journal:  J Med Econ       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.448

Review 2.  Cost effectiveness of cytotoxic and targeted therapy for metastatic breast cancer: a critical and systematic review.

Authors:  Patricia R Blank; Konstantin J Dedes; Thomas D Szucs
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of docetaxel (Taxotere) vs. 5-fluorouracil in combined therapy in the initial phases of breast cancer.

Authors:  M Martín-Jiménez; A Rodríguez-Lescure; M Ruiz-Borrego; M-A Seguí-Palmer; M Brosa-Riestra
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  Pharmacoeconomic considerations in the treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  Athanasios Pallis; Vasiliki Tsiantou; Efi Simou; Nikos Maniadakis
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2010-06-15

Review 5.  Reviewing the quality, health benefit and value for money of chemotherapy and targeted therapy for metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Xavier Ghislain Léon Victor Pouwels; Bram L T Ramaekers; Manuela A Joore
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-07-08       Impact factor: 4.872

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.