Literature DB >> 12773499

Graded limb targeting in an insect is caused by the shift of a single movement pattern.

Volker Durr1, Thomas Matheson.   

Abstract

Grooming responses are movements of a multi-jointed limb that are targeted toward a stimulus site on the body. To be successful, they require a continuous transformation of stimulus location into a corresponding motor pattern or selection and blending of a subset of cardinal motor patterns. Tactile stimulation of one forewing of a locust elicits characteristic grooming movements of the ipsilateral hind leg. An initial targeted trajectory that moves the tarsus toward the site of stimulation is followed by a cyclic trajectory in the region of the stimulus. We have analyzed both components of this behavior to quantify the relative effects of somatotopic stimulus position and leg start posture on three parameters: initial movement direction, accuracy, and grooming distribution. Accuracy and grooming distribution were significantly affected by the stimulus location but were not influenced by the initial leg posture. Both cues systematically shifted the initial movement direction from the onset of the response. The subsequent cyclic component of grooming movements forms a behavioral continuum with no clustering in joint angle space. We therefore conclude that forewing grooming in locusts is generated by a single movement pattern that is continuously shifted by a sensory cue signaling position on the forewing surface. Both vertebrates and invertebrates can switch between distinct movement forms to groom different parts of their bodies. Our data provide the first evidence that invertebrates, like vertebrates, also have graded control of limb targeting within the somatosensory receptive field of a single form of motor response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12773499     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00416.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  10 in total

1.  Passive resting state and history of antagonist muscle activity shape active extensions in an insect limb.

Authors:  Jan M Ache; Thomas Matheson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Control of swing movement: influences of differently shaped substrate.

Authors:  Michael Schumm; Holk Cruse
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-07-08       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Motor inhibition affects the speed but not accuracy of aimed limb movements in an insect.

Authors:  Delphine Calas-List; Anthony J Clare; Alexandra Komissarova; Thomas A Nielsen; Thomas Matheson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Integrative Biomimetics of Autonomous Hexapedal Locomotion.

Authors:  Volker Dürr; Paolo P Arena; Holk Cruse; Chris J Dallmann; Alin Drimus; Thierry Hoinville; Tammo Krause; Stefan Mátéfi-Tempfli; Jan Paskarbeit; Luca Patanè; Mattias Schäffersmann; Malte Schilling; Josef Schmitz; Roland Strauss; Leslie Theunissen; Alessandra Vitanza; Axel Schneider
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 5.  Mechanosensation and Adaptive Motor Control in Insects.

Authors:  John C Tuthill; Rachel I Wilson
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  A neural command circuit for grooming movement control.

Authors:  Stefanie Hampel; Romain Franconville; Julie H Simpson; Andrew M Seeds
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 7.  Grooming Behavior as a Mechanism of Insect Disease Defense.

Authors:  Marianna Zhukovskaya; Aya Yanagawa; Brian T Forschler
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 2.769

8.  Motor control of Drosophila feeding behavior.

Authors:  Olivia Schwarz; Ali Asgar Bohra; Xinyu Liu; Heinrich Reichert; Krishnaswamy VijayRaghavan; Jan Pielage
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Aimed limb movements in a hemimetabolous insect are intrinsically compensated for allometric wing growth by developmental mechanisms.

Authors:  Alexandra J Patel; Thomas Matheson
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Passive joint forces are tuned to limb use in insects and drive movements without motor activity.

Authors:  Jan M Ache; Thomas Matheson
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 10.834

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.