Literature DB >> 12773412

Possible expansion of "Window of Implantation" in pseudopregnant mice: time of implantation of embryos at different stages of development transferred into the same recipient.

Otoya Ueda1, Keigo Yorozu, Nobuo Kamada, Kou-Ichi Jishage, Yosuke Kawase, Yutaka Toyoda, Hiroshi Suzuki.   

Abstract

Blastocyst implantation and successful establishment of pregnancy require delicate interactions between the embryo and maternal environment. It is believed that the growth of transferred embryos of different ages is synchronized during preimplantation development and that such embryos are implanted in the uterus at the same time. To define the time of synchronization for developing embryos of different ages, embryos at two different stages of development were transferred separately into the oviducts of the same recipient. We then examined the subsequent development of the embryos at various time intervals after transfer. Pronucleus (PN) stage eggs were transferred separately to the right or left oviduct of recipients on Day 0, while eight-cell embryos (8C) were transferred to the other oviduct. For 8C, 5%, 63%, and 74% of transferred embryos were implanted in the uterus at 42, 66, and 90 h posttransfer, respectively. In contrast, none of the transferred PN was implanted until 90 h posttransfer. At 90 h posttransfer, 59% of the PN had successfully implanted. Histological examination revealed that developmental stage of the embryos in both groups synchronized around 162 h posttransfer, even though the implantation was accelerated in 8C compared with PN. Our results indicate that embryos of advanced stage transferred to the oviduct implant in the uterus in advance of younger embryos and that the uterine development is synchronized at the neural plate, presomite stage. Our results strongly suggest that uterine receptivity for implantation is expandable in pseudopregnant mice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12773412     DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.103.017608

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Reprod        ISSN: 0006-3363            Impact factor:   4.285


  9 in total

Review 1.  Physiological and molecular determinants of embryo implantation.

Authors:  Shuang Zhang; Haiyan Lin; Shuangbo Kong; Shumin Wang; Hongmei Wang; Haibin Wang; D Randall Armant
Journal:  Mol Aspects Med       Date:  2013-01-02

Review 2.  Pinopodes: Recent advancements, current perspectives, and future directions.

Authors:  Kelsey E Quinn; Brooke C Matson; Margeaux Wetendorf; Kathleen M Caron
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 4.102

3.  The influence of mouse Ped gene expression on postnatal development.

Authors:  Adam Watkins; Adrian Wilkins; Clive Osmond; Carol M Warner; Martina Comiskey; Mark Hanson; Tom P Fleming
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-11-03       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Mutation in folate metabolism causes epigenetic instability and transgenerational effects on development.

Authors:  Nisha Padmanabhan; Dongxin Jia; Colleen Geary-Joo; Xuchu Wu; Anne C Ferguson-Smith; Ernest Fung; Mark C Bieda; Floyd F Snyder; Roy A Gravel; James C Cross; Erica D Watson
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 5.  Trophoblast-uterine interactions at implantation.

Authors:  John D Aplin; Susan J Kimber
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2004-07-05       Impact factor: 5.211

6.  Detrimental effects of microgravity on mouse preimplantation development in vitro.

Authors:  Sayaka Wakayama; Yumi Kawahara; Chong Li; Kazuo Yamagata; Louis Yuge; Teruhiko Wakayama
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Embryos generated from oocytes lacking complex N- and O-glycans have compromised development and implantation.

Authors:  Patricia Grasa; Heidy Kaune; Suzannah A Williams
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 3.906

8.  Differential regulation of receptivity in two uterine horns of a recipient mouse following asynchronous embryo transfer.

Authors:  Shi-Jie Li; Tong-Song Wang; Fu-Niu Qin; Zhu Huang; Xiao-Huan Liang; Fei Gao; Zhuo Song; Zeng-Ming Yang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Disruption of Folate Metabolism Causes Poor Alignment and Spacing of Mouse Conceptuses for Multiple Generations.

Authors:  Amy L Wilkinson; Katerina Menelaou; Joanna Rakoczy; Xiu S Tan; Erica D Watson
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-12-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.