Literature DB >> 12773333

Transdiaphragmatic pressure control of airway pressure support in healthy subjects.

Tarek Sharshar1, Gilbert Desmarais, Bruno Louis, Gilles Macadou, Raphael Porcher, Alain Harf, Jean-Claude Raphaël, Daniel Isabey, Frédéric Lofaso.   

Abstract

We designed a new servoventilator that proportionally adjusts airway pressure to transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi) generated by the subject during inspiration. Each cycle is triggered by either a preset Pdi increase or a preset inspiratory flow value (whichever is reached first), whereas cycling-off is flow-dependent. We evaluated the servoventilator in seven healthy subjects at normocapnia and three levels of hypercapnia (normocapnia + 3, + 6, and + 9 mm Hg) comparatively with spontaneous breathing. Triggering was by Pdi in six subjects and flow in one. At all end-tidal carbon dioxide pressure levels, time from onset of diaphragm electromyographic activity to inspiratory flow was similar with and without the servoventilator. Airway pressure increased proportionally to Pdi variation during servoventilator breathing. Flow, tidal volume, respiratory rate, intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure, and esophageal and transdiaphragmatic pressure-time products increased significantly with hypercapnia with and without the servoventilator. Breathing pattern parameters were similar in the two breathing modes, and no differences were found for intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure or gastric pressure variation during exhalation. Esophageal and transdiaphragmatic pressure-time products were lower with than without the servoventilator. The Pdi-driven servoventilator was well synchronized to the subjects effort, delivering a pressure proportional to Pdi and reducing respiratory effort at normocapnia and hypercapnia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12773333     DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200203-241OC

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1073-449X            Impact factor:   21.405


  8 in total

1.  Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in infants with upper airway obstruction: comparison of continuous and bilevel positive pressure.

Authors:  Sandrine Essouri; Frédéric Nicot; Annick Clément; Erea-Noel Garabedian; Gilles Roger; Frédéric Lofaso; Brigitte Fauroux
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Bedside waveforms interpretation as a tool to identify patient-ventilator asynchronies.

Authors:  Dimitris Georgopoulos; George Prinianakis; Eumorfia Kondili
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-11-09       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Control of breathing during mechanical ventilation: who is the boss?

Authors:  Kathleen Williams; Marina Hinojosa-Kurtzberg; Sairam Parthasarathy
Journal:  Respir Care       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.258

Review 4.  [Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA). A new mode of assisted mechanical ventilation].

Authors:  O Moerer; J Barwing; M Quintel
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  Interdisciplinary approaches of transcranial magnetic stimulation applied to a respiratory neuronal circuitry model.

Authors:  Stéphane Vinit; Emilie Keomani; Thérèse B Deramaudt; Victoria M Spruance; Tatiana Bezdudnaya; Michael A Lane; Marcel Bonay; Michel Petitjean
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Patient-Ventilator Dyssynchrony.

Authors:  Elvira-Markela Antonogiannaki; Dimitris Georgopoulos; Evangelia Akoumianaki
Journal:  Korean J Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-11-30

7.  Nonassociative learning promotes respiratory entrainment to mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Shawna M MacDonald; Gang Song; Chi-Sang Poon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Bio-Inspired Controller on an FPGA Applied to Closed-Loop Diaphragmatic Stimulation.

Authors:  Adeline Zbrzeski; Yannick Bornat; Brian Hillen; Ricardo Siu; James Abbas; Ranu Jung; Sylvie Renaud
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 4.677

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.