BACKGROUND AND AIM: High fruit and vegetable intake is associated with health benefits for cancer and cardiovascular disease. An increase is therefore integral in recommendations for the prevention of chronic disease. However, measuring intake requires either extensive dietary assessment or the measurement of specific bio-markers which is neither cheap nor feasible for the routine assessment of an individual's diet in a community or primary care setting. Within the context of a study evaluating a dietary counselling programme to increase fruit and vegetable intake our aim was to assess the use of a simple tool to estimate fruit and vegetable intake. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied associations between bio-markers [plasma ascorbic acid, beta-carotene and alpha-tocopherol 24-hour urinary potassium excretion] and a two-item fruit and vegetable consumption questionnaire in 271 subjects (105 men and 166 women), aged 18 to 70 years. After controlling for age, sex, vitamin supplement use, smoking and body mass, those reporting a daily intake of > or = 5 portions of fruit and vegetables had higher potassium excretion (difference 15.6 [95% confidence interval: 6.2 to 25.0] mmol/24 h), urinary potassium/creatinine ratio (1.2 [0.5 to 2.0]) and plasma vitamin C (10.0 [-0.9 to 20.8] mumol/L) than those reporting < or = 2.5 portions per day. beta-carotene (p = 0.04), vitamin C (p = 0.01) and potassium excretion (p < 0.001) were associated with fruit rather than vegetable intake. The two-item questionnaire had high specificity; over 3/4 of participants who reported low intake also had bio-markers below the upper third of the distribution. CONCLUSION: Self report of fruit and vegetable intake through a simple questionnaire is confirmed by bio-markers for those eating less than five portions of fruit and vegetables a day. Although the tool is amenable to improvements for the detection of vegetable portions, it may prove useful for monitoring dietary preventive approaches in primary care without the use of invasive and costly biochemical measurements.
BACKGROUND AND AIM: High fruit and vegetable intake is associated with health benefits for cancer and cardiovascular disease. An increase is therefore integral in recommendations for the prevention of chronic disease. However, measuring intake requires either extensive dietary assessment or the measurement of specific bio-markers which is neither cheap nor feasible for the routine assessment of an individual's diet in a community or primary care setting. Within the context of a study evaluating a dietary counselling programme to increase fruit and vegetable intake our aim was to assess the use of a simple tool to estimate fruit and vegetable intake. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied associations between bio-markers [plasma ascorbic acid, beta-carotene and alpha-tocopherol 24-hour urinary potassium excretion] and a two-item fruit and vegetable consumption questionnaire in 271 subjects (105 men and 166 women), aged 18 to 70 years. After controlling for age, sex, vitamin supplement use, smoking and body mass, those reporting a daily intake of > or = 5 portions of fruit and vegetables had higher potassium excretion (difference 15.6 [95% confidence interval: 6.2 to 25.0] mmol/24 h), urinary potassium/creatinine ratio (1.2 [0.5 to 2.0]) and plasma vitamin C (10.0 [-0.9 to 20.8] mumol/L) than those reporting < or = 2.5 portions per day. beta-carotene (p = 0.04), vitamin C (p = 0.01) and potassium excretion (p < 0.001) were associated with fruit rather than vegetable intake. The two-item questionnaire had high specificity; over 3/4 of participants who reported low intake also had bio-markers below the upper third of the distribution. CONCLUSION: Self report of fruit and vegetable intake through a simple questionnaire is confirmed by bio-markers for those eating less than five portions of fruit and vegetables a day. Although the tool is amenable to improvements for the detection of vegetable portions, it may prove useful for monitoring dietary preventive approaches in primary care without the use of invasive and costly biochemical measurements.
Authors: Shenghui Wu; Susan P Fisher-Hoch; Belinda M Reininger; Miryoung Lee; Joseph B McCormick Journal: Nutr Cancer Date: 2019-04-24 Impact factor: 2.900
Authors: Clio Spanou; Sharon A Simpson; Kerry Hood; Adrian Edwards; David Cohen; Stephen Rollnick; Ben Carter; Jim McCambridge; Laurence Moore; Elizabeth Randell; Timothy Pickles; Christine Smith; Claire Lane; Fiona Wood; Hazel Thornton; Chris C Butler Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2010-09-21 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Debra L Franko; Tara M Cousineau; Rachel F Rodgers; James P Roehrig; Jessica A Hoffman Journal: J Nutr Educ Behav Date: 2012-08-26 Impact factor: 3.045
Authors: Randi L Wolf; Stephen J Lepore; Jonathan L Vandergrift; Lindsay Wetmore-Arkader; Elizabeth McGinty; Gabriel Pietrzak; Amy L Yaroch Journal: J Am Diet Assoc Date: 2008-08
Authors: Belinda M Reininger; Lisa Mitchell-Bennett; MinJae Lee; Rose Z Gowen; Cristina S Barroso; Jennifer L Gay; Mayra Vanessa Saldana Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2015-08-17 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Yuying Sun; Samantha S W Fung; Patrick K W Man; Alice N T Wan; Sunita Stewart; Tai Hing Lam; Sai Yin Ho Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-13 Impact factor: 3.390