Literature DB >> 12772236

Is adjunctive balloon postdilatation necessary after coronary stent deployment? Final results from the POSTIT trial.

Bruce R Brodie1, Christopher Cooper, Michael Jones, Peter Fitzgerald, Frank Cummins.   

Abstract

Early-generation balloon-expandable stents required postdilatation with noncompliant balloons at high pressure to optimize stent deployment. The need for adjunctive balloon postdilatation with modern stent delivery systems is unknown. Patients undergoing elective stenting were randomized to Boston Scientific NIR, Guidant Tri-Star/Tetra, and Medtronic AVE S670 stents. The primary endpoint was optimum stent deployment defined as a minimal stent diameter (MSD) >/= 90% of the average reference lumen diameter assessed by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) performed immediately following stent deployment. If, by operator assessment, the primary endpoint was not achieved with the stent delivery system, adjunctive postdilatation with noncompliant balloons was performed. Of 256 patients with IVUS studies adequate for core laboratory analysis, only 29% achieved optimum stent deployment with the stent delivery system. None of the baseline clinical or angiographic variables predicted optimum stent deployment. Of the procedural variables, the type of stent and nominal stent size were not predictors, but higher deployment pressures were associated with a higher frequency of optimum stent deployment (< 12 atm 14% vs. >/= 12 atm 36%; P = 0.007). The inability to achieve optimum stent deployment was not due to undersizing the stent delivery balloon, but rather to an inability of the stent delivery balloon to expand fully the stent to nominal size. In patients who underwent postdilatation, the frequency of achieving optimum stent deployment increased from 21% to 42%, minimal stent area increased from 6.6 +/- 2.2 to 7.8 +/- 2.3 mm(2), and MSD increased from 2.6 +/- 0.5 to 2.8 +/- 0.4 mm. These data stress the continued need for adjunctive balloon postdilatation with modern stent delivery systems. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2003;59:184-192. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12772236     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.10474

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  16 in total

1.  Differential effects of post-dilation after stent deployment in patients presenting with and without acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Zhi-Jiang Zhang; Oscar C Marroquin; Roslyn A Stone; Joel L Weissfeld; Suresh R Mulukutla; Faith Selzer; Kevin E Kip
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.749

2.  Compliance charts to guide non-complex small artery stenting: validation by quantitative coronary angiography.

Authors:  Yohan Chacko; J Kimberly Haladyn; Debbie M Smith; Richard Lim
Journal:  Heart Asia       Date:  2013-05-31

3.  Overaggressive stent expansion without intravascular imaging: impact on restenosis.

Authors:  Yohan Chacko; Richard Chan; J Kimberly Haladyn; Richard Lim
Journal:  Heart Asia       Date:  2014-02-27

4.  Relationship Between Operator Volume and Long-Term Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Alexander C Fanaroff; Pearl Zakroysky; Daniel Wojdyla; Lisa A Kaltenbach; Matthew W Sherwood; Matthew T Roe; Tracy Y Wang; Eric D Peterson; Hitinder S Gurm; Mauricio G Cohen; John C Messenger; Sunil V Rao
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Expert Opinion: Optimising Stent Deployment in Contemporary Practice: The Role of Intracoronary Imaging and Non-compliant Balloons.

Authors:  Ashok Seth; Sajal Gupta; Vivudh Pratap Singh; Vijay Kumar
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2017-09

6.  Stent expansion: a combination of delivery balloon underexpansion and acute stent recoil reduces predicted stent diameter irrespective of reference vessel size.

Authors:  Shahid Aziz; John L Morris; Raphael A Perry; Rodney H Stables
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions within coronary artery bypass grafts.

Authors:  Rafał Januszek; Zbigniew Siudak; Artur Dziewierz; Tomasz Rakowski; Dariusz Dudek; Stanisław Bartuś
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 3.318

8.  A different way of coronary lesion preparation: stentablation and rotastenting.

Authors:  Ibrahim Akin; Steffen Pohlmann; Christoph A Nienaber; Hüseyin Ince
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Cardiol       Date:  2012-02-20

Review 9.  Optimization of stent deployment by intravascular ultrasound.

Authors:  Hyuck-Jun Yoon; Seung-Ho Hur
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 2.884

10.  Stent underexpansion in angiographic guided percutaneous coronary intervention, despite adjunctive balloon post-dilatation, in drug eluting stent era.

Authors:  Mehrdad Taherioun; Mohammad Hassan Namazi; Morteza Safi; Habibolah Saadat; Hossein Vakili; Saeed Alipour-Parsa; Hasan Rajabi-Moghadam; Shamsedin Pedari
Journal:  ARYA Atheroscler       Date:  2014-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.