Literature DB >> 12772209

New approaches in hominoid taxonomy: morphometrics.

Franck Guy1, Michel Brunet, Matthieu Schmittbuhl, Laurent Viriot.   

Abstract

We report here on new cranial data relevant to hominoid taxonomic analyses, based on a study of 438 skulls belonging to 13 nonhuman living hominoid taxa. Nineteen landmarks were selected to describe the overall shape of the maxillofacial complex, in order to investigate its discriminative power in taxonomic analyses. We used a geometric morphometrics approach to depict morphological variation from the genus down to the subspecific level, and we evaluated whether our morphologic criteria are relevant to discriminating species and subspecies among living hominoids. Considering previous genetic studies, we discuss whether our results can be extrapolated to the hominin fossil record, providing a reference for species and subspecies morphologic differentiation. Our results indicate that the relative warp method, as applied to facial landmarks, provides a powerful tool to discriminate taxa down to a subspecific level. Results show a noticeable divergence of P. t. verus compared to P. t. troglodytes and P. t. schweinfurthii. According to our data, the distance between eastern and western gorilla populations as well as between Bornean and Sumatran orangutan subspecies is as great as between the two species of Pan. In the same manner, differences between Hylobates and Symphalangus are similar to those between Pan and Gorilla genera. Congruence between the morphological distances computed in this study and previous morphological and genetical studies strongly supports their relevance for morphological species recognition in paleoanthropology. Our data provide an objective standard for assessing taxonomic differences among hominoids, and will enable us to define more precisely the significance of morphological differences in the fossil record. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12772209     DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.10261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol        ISSN: 0002-9483            Impact factor:   2.868


  7 in total

1.  The shape of the hominoid proximal femur: a geometric morphometric analysis.

Authors:  Elizabeth H Harmon
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  The sampling scheme matters: Pan troglodytes troglodytes and P. t. schweinfurthii are characterized by clinal genetic variation rather than a strong subspecies break.

Authors:  Tillmann Fünfstück; Mimi Arandjelovic; David B Morgan; Crickette Sanz; Patricia Reed; Sarah H Olson; Ken Cameron; Alain Ondzie; Martine Peeters; Linda Vigilant
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 2.868

3.  More reliable estimates of divergence times in Pan using complete mtDNA sequences and accounting for population structure.

Authors:  Anne C Stone; Fabia U Battistuzzi; Laura S Kubatko; George H Perry; Evan Trudeau; Hsiuman Lin; Sudhir Kumar
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Morphometrics and hominoid phylogeny: Support for a chimpanzee-human clade and differentiation among great ape subspecies.

Authors:  Charles A Lockwood; William H Kimbel; John M Lynch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-03-22       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Re-evaluation of Sinocastor (Rodentia: Castoridae) with implications on the origin of modern beavers.

Authors:  Natalia Rybczynski; Elizabeth M Ross; Joshua X Samuels; William W Korth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Obtaining new resolutions in carnivore tooth pit morphological analyses: A methodological update for digital taphonomy.

Authors:  Lloyd A Courtenay; Darío Herranz-Rodrigo; Rosa Huguet; Miguel Ángel Maté-González; Diego González-Aguilera; José Yravedra
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Facial orientation and facial shape in extant great apes: a geometric morphometric analysis of covariation.

Authors:  Dimitri Neaux; Franck Guy; Emmanuel Gilissen; Walter Coudyzer; Patrick Vignaud; Stéphane Ducrocq
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.