Literature DB >> 12771947

Resistance to DNA-damaging agents is discordant from experimental metastatic capacity in MEF ras-transformants-expressing gain of function MTp53.

Robert G Bristow1, James Peacock, Anne Jang, John Kim, Richard P Hill, Samuel Benchimol.   

Abstract

Tumor cells can acquire aggressive phenotypes secondary to the loss of expression of the wild-type p53 (WTp53) protein or by the gain of function for selected mutant p53 (MTp53) proteins. However, it is unclear as to whether the development of aggressive phenotypes is inter-related. Herein we report the radiosensitivity, chemosensitivity, and in vivo growth characteristics of isogenic p53(-/-) MEF ras-transformants that variably express an MTp53 protein. Initial experiments revealed significant clonal heterogeneity with respect to cellular sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents (i.e. ionizing radiation, ultraviolet radiation, cis-platinum, and methotrexate) within subclones of a pre-existing p53(-/-) MEF cell population. Moreover, this differential sensitivity was also observed within subclones of p53(-/-) MEF cells transformed with an activated ras allele, suggesting that secondary genetic events and clonal selection, but not cellular transformation per se, may drive the resistance patterns for certain null-p53 tumors. In contrast, uniform resistance was observed following the additional transfection of an MTp53 allele (MTp53pro193) into p53(-/-) MEF transformants and p53(-/-) DP-16 Friend erythroleukemia cells, consistent with a gain of MTp53 function for this allele. Relative tumor growth rate and experimental metastatic ability was not enhanced by MTp53pro193 expression. Our results support the concept that gain of MTp53pro193 function leads to the selection of dominant clones, which may exhibit cellular resistance following cancer therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12771947     DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1206405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncogene        ISSN: 0950-9232            Impact factor:   9.867


  9 in total

Review 1.  Therapeutic targeting of p53: all mutants are equal, but some mutants are more equal than others.

Authors:  Kanaga Sabapathy; David P Lane
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  p53 mutants induce transcription of NF-κB2 in H1299 cells through CBP and STAT binding on the NF-κB2 promoter and gain of function activity.

Authors:  Catherine A Vaughan; Shilpa Singh; Brad Windle; Heidi M Sankala; Paul R Graves; W Andrew Yeudall; Swati P Deb; Sumitra Deb
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 4.013

Review 3.  Mutant p53: one name, many proteins.

Authors:  William A Freed-Pastor; Carol Prives
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  Tumor senescence and radioresistant tumor-initiating cells (TICs): let sleeping dogs lie!

Authors:  Gaetano Zafarana; Robert G Bristow
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2010-07-05       Impact factor: 6.466

5.  Impaired p53 binding to importin: a novel mechanism of cytoplasmic sequestration identified in oxaliplatin-resistant cells.

Authors:  E Komlodi-Pasztor; S Trostel; D Sackett; M Poruchynsky; T Fojo
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2009-07-06       Impact factor: 9.867

6.  Gain-of-Function Activity of Mutant p53 in Lung Cancer through Up-Regulation of Receptor Protein Tyrosine Kinase Axl.

Authors:  Catherine A Vaughan; Shilpa Singh; Brad Windle; W Andrew Yeudall; Rebecca Frum; Steven R Grossman; Swati P Deb; Sumitra Deb
Journal:  Genes Cancer       Date:  2012-07

Review 7.  RUNX Family Participates in the Regulation of p53-Dependent DNA Damage Response.

Authors:  Toshinori Ozaki; Akira Nakagawara; Hiroki Nagase
Journal:  Int J Genomics       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 2.326

Review 8.  The Contrived Mutant p53 Oncogene - Beyond Loss of Functions.

Authors:  Kanaga Sabapathy
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  Addiction of lung cancer cells to GOF p53 is promoted by up-regulation of epidermal growth factor receptor through multiple contacts with p53 transactivation domain and promoter.

Authors:  Catherine A Vaughan; Isabella Pearsall; Shilpa Singh; Brad Windle; Swati P Deb; Steven R Grossman; W Andrew Yeudall; Sumitra Deb
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-03-15
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.