Literature DB >> 12771835

Kinematics of three variations of the Freeman-Samuelson total knee prosthesis.

Tuuli Saari1, Johan Uvehammer, Lars V Carlsson, Peter Herberts, Lars Regnér, Johan Kärrholm.   

Abstract

The effect of changes in the articulating surfaces on the kinematics of the Freeman-Samuelson total knee replacement was evaluated. Twenty-two patients (22 knees) (median age, 69 years) were randomized to a standard design with a fixed polyethylene bearing, a design with a mobile bearing, or a new design with a spherical medial femoral condyle with a fixed bearing. The patients were studied with radiostereometry and film-exchangers at 0 degrees nonweightbearing and during active weightbearing extension from 45 degrees to 15 degrees. The center of the tibial tray with a mobile-bearing prosthesis occupied a more anterior position than observed in the designs with a fixed bearing. The medial femoral condyle center had a more posterior position in the standard design than in the design with a spherical medial condyle. From a distally displaced position at 45 degrees, the medial condylar center displaced a mean of 1.8 mm proximally during extension in the standard design and had a constant position in the meniscal design. In the spherical design the medial condyle was displaced proximally at 45 degrees and displaced a mean of 1.6 mm distally during extension. The reduced anteroposterior and proximodistal translations in the meniscal design are compatible with improved congruency between the components. The design with a spherical medial condyle stabilized anteroposterior motions, but showed more pronounced proximodistal displacement medially than did the other two designs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12771835     DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000063792.32430.82

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  7 in total

Review 1.  No differences between fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  B L Fransen; D C van Duijvenbode; M J M Hoozemans; B J Burger
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Mid-term clinical results of alumina medial pivot total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Takahiro Iida; Yukihide Minoda; Yoshinori Kadoya; Yoshio Matsui; Akio Kobayashi; Hiroyoshi Iwaki; Mitsuhiko Ikebuchi; Taku Yoshida; Hiroaki Nakamura
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-05       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Total knee replacement influences both knee and hip joint kinematics during stair climbing.

Authors:  Tuuli Saari; Roy Tranberg; Roland Zügner; Johan Uvehammer; Johan Kärrholm
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Lack of axial rotation in mobile-bearing knee designs.

Authors:  Ray C Wasielewski; Richard D Komistek; Sumesh M Zingde; Kate C Sheridan; Mohamed R Mahfouz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Tibiofemoral kinematic analysis of knee flexion for a medial pivot knee.

Authors:  Pradeep Moonot; S Mu; G T Railton; R E Field; S A Banks
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Simultaneous measurements of knee motion using an optical tracking system and radiostereometric analysis (RSA).

Authors:  Roy Tranberg; Tuuli Saari; Roland Zügner; Johan Kärrholm
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.717

7.  Mobile-bearing versus fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Ashraf T Hantouly; Abdulaziz F Ahmed; Osama Alzobi; Ammar Toubasi; Motasem Salameh; Aissam Elmhiregh; Shamsi Hameed; Ghalib O Ahmed; Abtin Alvand; Mohammed Al Ateeq Al Dosari
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-05-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.