BACKGROUND: Flucloxacillin is an important antimicrobial drug in the treatment of infections with Staphylococcus aureus and therefore is often used in staphylococcal infections. Furthermore, flucloxacillin has a high protein binding rate as for example ceftriaxone or teicoplanin--drugs which have formerly been characterized as not being dialyzable. METHODS: The pharmacokinetic parameters of 4.0 g flucloxacillin every 8 h were examined in 10 intensive care patients during continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) using a polyamide capillary hemofilter. In addition, the difficulty of calculating the hemofiltration clearance of a highly protein-bound drug is described. RESULTS: Flucloxacillin serum levels were significantly lowered (56.9 +/- 24.0%) even though only 15% of the drug was detected in the ultrafiltrate. Elimination half-life, total body clearance and sieving coefficient were 4.9 +/- 0.7 h, 117.2 +/- 79.1 ml/min and 0.21 +/- 0.09, respectively. These discrepancies can be explained by the high protein binding of flucloxacillin, the adsorbing property of polyamide and the equation in order to calculate hemofiltration clearance. The unbound fraction of a 4.0 g flucloxacillin dosage facilitates time above the minimum inhibitory concentration (T > MIC) of 60% only for strains up to a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 0.5 mg/l. CONCLUSION: Based on the data of this study, we conclude that intensive care patients with staphylococcal infections on CVVH should be treated with 4.0 g flucloxacillin every 8 h which was safe and well tolerated. Moreover, further studies with highly protein-bound drugs are recommended to check the classical 'hemodialysis' equation as the standard equation in calculating the CVVH clearance of highly protein-bound drugs. Copyright 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel
BACKGROUND:Flucloxacillin is an important antimicrobial drug in the treatment of infections with Staphylococcus aureus and therefore is often used in staphylococcal infections. Furthermore, flucloxacillin has a high protein binding rate as for example ceftriaxone or teicoplanin--drugs which have formerly been characterized as not being dialyzable. METHODS: The pharmacokinetic parameters of 4.0 g flucloxacillin every 8 h were examined in 10 intensive care patients during continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) using a polyamide capillary hemofilter. In addition, the difficulty of calculating the hemofiltration clearance of a highly protein-bound drug is described. RESULTS:Flucloxacillin serum levels were significantly lowered (56.9 +/- 24.0%) even though only 15% of the drug was detected in the ultrafiltrate. Elimination half-life, total body clearance and sieving coefficient were 4.9 +/- 0.7 h, 117.2 +/- 79.1 ml/min and 0.21 +/- 0.09, respectively. These discrepancies can be explained by the high protein binding of flucloxacillin, the adsorbing property of polyamide and the equation in order to calculate hemofiltration clearance. The unbound fraction of a 4.0 g flucloxacillin dosage facilitates time above the minimum inhibitory concentration (T > MIC) of 60% only for strains up to a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 0.5 mg/l. CONCLUSION: Based on the data of this study, we conclude that intensive care patients with staphylococcal infections on CVVH should be treated with 4.0 g flucloxacillin every 8 h which was safe and well tolerated. Moreover, further studies with highly protein-bound drugs are recommended to check the classical 'hemodialysis' equation as the standard equation in calculating the CVVH clearance of highly protein-bound drugs. Copyright 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel
Authors: Qi Tian; Charles D Gomersall; Margaret Ip; Perpetua E Tan; Gavin M Joynt; Gordon Y S Choi Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2007-12-17 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Catherine S C Bouman; Hendrikus J M van Kan; Richard P Koopmans; Johanna C Korevaar; Marcus J Schultz; Margreeth B Vroom Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2006-10-17 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: M G Vossen; J M Wenisch; A Maier-Salamon; A Fritsch; K Saria; C Zuba; S Jilch; R Lemmerer; M Unger; U Jaehde; W Jäger; F Thalhammer Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2015-12-28 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: M G Vossen; L Ehmann; S Pferschy; A Maier-Salamon; M Haidinger; C Weiser; J M Wenisch; K Saria; C Kajahn; S Jilch; R Lemmerer; M Bécède; M Zeitlinger; C Kloft; W Jäger; F Thalhammer Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2018-04-26 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Cornelia B Landersdorfer; Carl M J Kirkpatrick; Martina Kinzig-Schippers; Jürgen B Bulitta; Ulrike Holzgrabe; George L Drusano; Fritz Sörgel Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2007-06-18 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: M Biagi; D Butler; X Tan; S Qasmieh; K Tejani; S Patel; R M Rivosecchi; M H Nguyen; C J Clancy; R K Shields; E Wenzler Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2019-09-16 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Fekade Bruck Sime; Michael S Roberts; Sandra L Peake; Jeffrey Lipman; Jason A Roberts Journal: Ann Intensive Care Date: 2012-07-28 Impact factor: 6.925