Comparison of the fit and fill between the Anatomic Hip femoral component and the VerSys Taper femoral component using virtual implantation on the ORTHODOC workstation.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate differences in fit and fill between an anatomic femoral component and a straight tapered femoral component, both of which were designed for proximal fit and fill using the preoperative planning workstation of the ROBODOC system (ORTHODOC). Anatomic Hip (Zimmer) and VerSys Taper (Zimmer) femoral components were each virtually implanted into 50 femora (25 dysplastic femora and 25 anatomically normal femora) using the ORTHODOC workstation. The fit and fill of the femoral components were measured on cross-sectional images. The VerSys Taper femoral components showed significantly better fit and fill than the Anatomic Hip femoral components at the lower corner of the femoral neck cut and the middle of the femoral component in both the dysplastic femora and the anatomically normal femora. The Anatomic Hip femoral components showed significantly better fit and fill than the VerSys Taper femoral components 1 cm proximal from the femoral component tip in both dysplastic femora and anatomically normal femora. There was no significant difference in fit and fill between the two types of femoral component at the center of the lesser trochanter or 1 cm distal from the center of the lesser trochanter in either dysplastic femora or anatomically normal femora. Overall, VerSys Taper femoral components appear to provide better proximal fit and fill than Anatomic Hip femoral components in both dysplastic and anatomically normal femora.