Literature DB >> 12768165

Nasal vs oral intubation.

L Holzapfel1.   

Abstract

Both nasal and oral route for intubation have advantages and disadvantages. Oral intubation is easier to perform, faster and less painful than nasal intubation under direct laryngoscopy, while blind nasal intubation represents a good alternative in conscious patient, without sedation. In trauma patient, oral route should be preferred, with cervical immobilisation. By the contrary, nasal intubation can cause bleeding, retro-pharyngeal and turbinate bones injury, but it seems preferable in preventing laryngeal complications. Moreover nasal intubation seem to increase risk for sinusitis while, there is no clear advantage for any of the two routes, concerning nosocomial pneumonia, bacteriemia and otitis. Nevertheless nasal route increases comfort for the patient and decreases injury and necrosis of tongue and lips; tube fastening is simpler thus reducing accidental extubation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12768165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol        ISSN: 0375-9393            Impact factor:   3.051


  9 in total

1.  Evaluation of modified nasal to oral endotracheal tube switch-For modified alar base cinching after maxillary orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Taj Nizam Shakeel Shaik; Sridhar Meka; Pavan Kumar Ch; Naga Neelima Devi Kolli; P Srinivas Chakravarthi; Vivekanand S Kattimani; Krishna Prasad L
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2017-03-23

2.  Nasal intubation for trauma patients and increased in-hospital mortality.

Authors:  Ryo Yamamoto; Seitaro Fujishima; Junichi Sasaki
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  CONSORT the effect of intraoperative dexmedetomidine on hemodynamic responses during emergence from nasotracheal intubation after oral surgery.

Authors:  Youn Yi Jo; Hong Soon Kim; Kyung Cheon Lee; Young Jin Chang; Youseok Shin; Hyun Jeong Kwak
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.889

4.  Item Selection and Content Validity of the Risk Factors of Post-Intubation Tracheal Stenosis Observation Questionnaire for ICU-Admitted Patients.

Authors:  Roya Farzanegan; Behrooz Farzanegan; Maryam Alehashem; Mahdi Zangi; Sharareh R Niakan Kalhori; Kambiz Sheikhy; Habib Emami; Mohammad Behgam Shadmehr
Journal:  Tanaffos       Date:  2017

5.  Maxillary sinusitis developed as sequelae of accidental middle turbinectomy that occurred during nasotracheal intubation: a case report.

Authors:  Joungmin Kim; Taehee Pyeon; Hyun Jung Lee; Hyung Chae Yang
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 2.217

6.  A randomized controlled trial comparing McGRATH series 5 videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation.

Authors:  Reshma Ambulkar; Priya Ranganathan; Sukhada Savarkar; Jigeeshu V Divatia
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2021-01-18

7.  Recommendations for nasotracheal tube insertion depths in neonates.

Authors:  Chinedu Ulrich Ebenebe; Kristina Schriever; Monika Wolf; Jochen Herrmann; Dominique Singer; Philipp Deindl
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 3.569

Review 8.  The Role of Dysbiosis in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19 and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Authors:  Denise Battaglini; Chiara Robba; Andrea Fedele; Sebastian Trancǎ; Samir Giuseppe Sukkar; Vincenzo Di Pilato; Matteo Bassetti; Daniele Roberto Giacobbe; Antonio Vena; Nicolò Patroniti; Lorenzo Ball; Iole Brunetti; Antoni Torres Martí; Patricia Rieken Macedo Rocco; Paolo Pelosi
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-06-04

9.  ETCO2 waveforms-assisted awake nasal fibreoptic intubation.

Authors:  Ting Li; Tongtong Liu; Meihong Li; Chuanhan Zhang; Wenlong Yao
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 1.977

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.