Literature DB >> 12767699

Safety assessment for genetically modified sweet pepper and tomato.

Zhang-Liang Chen1, Hongya Gu, Yi Li, Yilan Su, Ping Wu, Zhicheng Jiang, Xiaotian Ming, Jinhua Tian, Naisui Pan, Li-Jia Qu.   

Abstract

The coat protein (CP) gene of cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) was cloned from a Chinese CMV isolate, the CaMV promoter and NOS terminator added and the gene construct was transformed into both sweet pepper and tomato plants to confer resistance to CMV. Safety assessments of these genetically modified (GM) plants were conducted. It was found that these two GM products showed no genotoxicity either in vitro or in vivo by the micronucleus test, sperm aberration test and Ames test. Animal feeding studies showed no significant differences in growth, body weight gain, food consumption, hematology, blood biochemical indices, organ weights and histopathology between rats or mice of either sex fed with either GM sweet pepper or tomato diets compared with those with non-GM diets. These results demonstrate that the CMV-resistant sweet pepper and tomato are comparable to the non-GM counterparts in terms of food safety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12767699     DOI: 10.1016/s0300-483x(03)00111-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicology        ISSN: 0300-483X            Impact factor:   4.221


  7 in total

1.  GM food and crops: what went wrong in the UK? Many of the public's concerns have little to do with science.

Authors:  Derek Burke
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 8.807

2.  Comparative effects of dietary administered transgenic and conventional papaya on selected intestinal parameters in rat models.

Authors:  Melissa Powell; Andrew O Wheatley; Felix Omoruyi; Helen N Asemota; Nadia P Williams; Paula F Tennant
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 2.788

3.  Comparison of transgenic Gerbera hybrida lines and traditional varieties shows no differences in cytotoxicity or metabolic fingerprints.

Authors:  Miia Marika Ainasoja; Leena Lyydia Pohjala; Päivi Sirpa Marjaana Tammela; Panu Juhani Somervuo; Pia Maarit Vuorela; Teemu Heikki Teeri
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 2.788

4.  Safety assessment of leaf curl virus resistant tomato developed using viral derived sequences.

Authors:  Abinav K Singh; Shelly Praveen; Bhanu P Singh; Anupam Varma; Naveen Arora
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 5.  Three strategies of transgenic manipulation for crop improvement.

Authors:  Haoqiang Yu; Qingqing Yang; Fengling Fu; Wanchen Li
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 6.  Transgenic and genome-edited fruits: background, constraints, benefits, and commercial opportunities.

Authors:  Maria Lobato-Gómez; Seanna Hewitt; Teresa Capell; Paul Christou; Amit Dhingra; Patricia Sarai Girón-Calva
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 7.291

Review 7.  The use of whole food animal studies in the safety assessment of genetically modified crops: limitations and recommendations.

Authors:  Andrew Bartholomaeus; Wayne Parrott; Genevieve Bondy; Kate Walker
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 5.635

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.