Literature DB >> 12767404

Neyman's bias re-visited.

Gerry Hill1, James Connelly, Réjean Hébert, Joan Lindsay, Wayne Millar.   

Abstract

In case-control studies using prevalent cases, an apparent association may be spurious if the risk factor affects survival. In his description of this potential bias, Neyman disregarded competing risks. We use a compartment model to illustrate Neyman's bias and show that it can explain the apparent association only if the risk factor influences mortality from the disease being studied. Any effect of the risk factor on mortality from other causes is not relevant. The apparent protective effect of smoking in relation to Alzheimer disease is used as an example, but the result holds for any irreversible noncommunicable disease and for any dichotomous risk factor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12767404     DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(02)00571-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  22 in total

1.  Bias.

Authors:  Miguel Delgado-Rodríguez; Javier Llorca
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 2.  [Systematic errors in clinical studies : A comprehensive survey].

Authors:  W A Golder
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 3.  [Systematic errors in clinical studies : A comprehensive survey].

Authors:  W A Golder
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.372

4.  Deconstructing the smoking-preeclampsia paradox through a counterfactual framework.

Authors:  Miguel Angel Luque-Fernandez; Helga Zoega; Unnur Valdimarsdottir; Michelle A Williams
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 8.082

5.  Genetic risk for coronary heart disease alters the influence of Alzheimer's genetic risk on mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Jeremy A Elman; Matthew S Panizzon; Mark W Logue; Nathan A Gillespie; Michael C Neale; Chandra A Reynolds; Daniel E Gustavson; Brinda K Rana; Ole A Andreassen; Anders M Dale; Carol E Franz; Michael J Lyons; William S Kremen
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 4.673

6.  In a Stationary Population, the Average Lifespan of the Living Is a Length-Biased Life Expectancy.

Authors:  Elizabeth Wrigley-Field; Dennis Feehan
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2022-02-01

Review 7.  Developing and evaluating polygenic risk prediction models for stratified disease prevention.

Authors:  Nilanjan Chatterjee; Jianxin Shi; Montserrat García-Closas
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 53.242

8.  Hypothesis Tests for Neyman's Bias in Case-Control Studies.

Authors:  D M Swanson; C D Anderson; R A Betensky
Journal:  J Appl Stat       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 1.404

9.  Risk for late-life re-injury, dementia and death among individuals with traumatic brain injury: a population-based study.

Authors:  Kristen Dams-O'Connor; Laura E Gibbons; James D Bowen; Susan M McCurry; Eric B Larson; Paul K Crane
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 10.154

10.  Effect of Point-of-Care Diagnostics on Maternal Outcomes in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Women: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tivani P Mashamba-Thompson; Rebecca L Morgan; Benn Sartorius; Brittany Dennis; Paul K Drain; Lehana Thabane
Journal:  Point Care       Date:  2017-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.