Literature DB >> 12767293

Evaluation of polyethylene hollow-fiber membranes for hydrogen delivery to support reductive dechlorination in a soil column.

X Ma1, P J Novak, L W Clapp, M J Semmens, R M Hozalski.   

Abstract

Engineered systems are often needed to supply an electron donor, such as hydrogen (H(2)), to the subsurface to stimulate the biological dehalogenation of perchloroethene (PCE) to ethene. A column study was performed to evaluate the ability of gas permeable hollow-fiber membranes to supply H(2) directly to PCE-contaminated groundwater to facilitate bioremediation. Two glass columns were packed with soil obtained from a trichloroethene-contaminated site at Cape Canaveral, Florida, and were fed a minimal medium spiked with PCE (7 microM) for 391 days. The columns were operated in parallel, with one column receiving H(2) via polyethylene hollow-fiber membranes (lumen H(2) pressure of approximately 1atm) and a control column receiving no H(2). PCE was initially dechlorinated at a similar rate and to a similar extent in both columns, likely due to the presence of soil organic matter that was able to support dechlorination. After 265 days of operation, dechlorination performance declined in the control column and the benefits of membrane-supplied H(2) became evident. Although the membrane-supplied H(2) effectively stimulated PCE dechlorination at the end of the experiment (days 359-391), the system was inefficient in that only 5% of the supplied H(2) was used for dechlorination. Most of the remainder was used to support methanogenesis (94%). Despite the dominance of methanogens, nearly complete dechlorination of PCE to ethene was observed in the H(2)-fed column. In addition to the inefficient use of H(2), operational problems included excessive foulant accumulation on the outside of the membrane fibers and water condensation inside the fibers. Use of alternative membrane materials and changes to the operating approach (e.g. pulsing or supplying H(2) at low partial pressures) may help to overcome these problems so that this technology can provide effective and stable remediation of aquifers contaminated with chlorinated ethenes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12767293     DOI: 10.1016/S0043-1354(03)00111-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  5 in total

1.  Effects of Sulfate Reduction on Trichloroethene Dechlorination by Dehalococcoides-Containing Microbial Communities.

Authors:  Xinwei Mao; Alexandra Polasko; Lisa Alvarez-Cohen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Electrical stimulation of microbial PCB degradation in sediment.

Authors:  Chan Lan Chun; Rayford B Payne; Kevin R Sowers; Harold D May
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2012-10-13       Impact factor: 11.236

3.  The roles of methanogens and acetogens in dechlorination of trichloroethene using different electron donors.

Authors:  Li-Lian Wen; Yin Zhang; Ya-Wei Pan; Wen-Qi Wu; Shao-Hua Meng; Chen Zhou; Youneng Tang; Ping Zheng; He-Ping Zhao
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-08-02       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Bioelectrochemical denitrification on biocathode buried in simulated aquifer saturated with nitrate-contaminated groundwater.

Authors:  Van Khanh Nguyen; Younghyun Park; Jaecheul Yu; Taeho Lee
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Role of bicarbonate as a pH buffer and electron sink in microbial dechlorination of chloroethenes.

Authors:  Anca G Delgado; Prathap Parameswaran; Devyn Fajardo-Williams; Rolf U Halden; Rosa Krajmalnik-Brown
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 5.328

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.