BACKGROUND: The psychological difficulties facing men with prostate cancer are acknowledged widely, yet identifying men who may benefit from mental health treatment has proven to be a challenging task. The authors developed the Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer (MAX-PC) to facilitate the identification and assessment of men with prostate cancer-related anxiety. This scale consists of three subscales that measure general prostate cancer anxiety, anxiety related to prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels in particular, and fear of recurrence. METHODS: Ambulatory men with prostate cancer (n = 385 patients) were recruited from clinics throughout the United States. Prior to routine PSA tests, participants completed a baseline assessment packet that included the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; the Distress Thermometer; the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Scale, Prostate Module; and measures of role functioning, sleep, and urinary functioning. PSA values from the last three tests also were collected. Follow-up evaluation was completed within 2 weeks after patients learned of their PSA test result using a subset of these scales. RESULTS: Analysis of the MAX-PC revealed a high degree of internal consistency and test-retest reliability for the total score and for the three subscales, although reliability was somewhat weaker for the PSA Anxiety Scale. Concurrent validity was demonstrated by correlations between the MAX-PC and measures of anxiety. Overall changes in PSA levels were correlated only modestly with changes in MAX-PC scores (correlation coefficient, 0.13; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The MAX-PC appears to be a valid and reliable measure of anxiety in men with prostate cancer receiving ambulatory care. Copyright 2003 American Cancer Society.
BACKGROUND: The psychological difficulties facing men with prostate cancer are acknowledged widely, yet identifying men who may benefit from mental health treatment has proven to be a challenging task. The authors developed the Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer (MAX-PC) to facilitate the identification and assessment of men with prostate cancer-related anxiety. This scale consists of three subscales that measure general prostate cancer anxiety, anxiety related to prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels in particular, and fear of recurrence. METHODS: Ambulatory men with prostate cancer (n = 385 patients) were recruited from clinics throughout the United States. Prior to routine PSA tests, participants completed a baseline assessment packet that included the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; the Distress Thermometer; the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Scale, Prostate Module; and measures of role functioning, sleep, and urinary functioning. PSA values from the last three tests also were collected. Follow-up evaluation was completed within 2 weeks after patients learned of their PSA test result using a subset of these scales. RESULTS: Analysis of the MAX-PC revealed a high degree of internal consistency and test-retest reliability for the total score and for the three subscales, although reliability was somewhat weaker for the PSAAnxiety Scale. Concurrent validity was demonstrated by correlations between the MAX-PC and measures of anxiety. Overall changes in PSA levels were correlated only modestly with changes in MAX-PC scores (correlation coefficient, 0.13; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The MAX-PC appears to be a valid and reliable measure of anxiety in men with prostate cancer receiving ambulatory care. Copyright 2003 American Cancer Society.
Authors: Jennifer Moye; Jennifer Schuster Wachen; Elizabeth A Mulligan; Kelly Doherty; Aanand D Naik Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2013-09-16 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Andrea M Tavlarides; Steven C Ames; David D Thiel; Nancy N Diehl; Alexander S Parker Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2014-06-21 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Caroleen W Quach; Michelle M Langer; Ronald C Chen; David Thissen; Deborah S Usinger; Marc A Emerson; Bryce B Reeve Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2016-05-30 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Scott D Ramsey; Steven B Zeliadt; David K Blough; Carol M Moinpour; Ingrid J Hall; Judith Lee Smith; Donatus U Ekwueme; Catherine R Fedorenko; Megan E Fairweather; Lisel M Koepl; Ian M Thompson; Thomas E Keane; David F Penson Journal: J Sex Med Date: 2013-09-30 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: William G Chu; Brian J Kim; Jeff Slezak; Teresa N Harrison; Joy Gelfond; Steven J Jacobsen; Gary W Chien Journal: World J Urol Date: 2015-03-12 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Laura C Bouchard; Betina Yanez; Jason R Dahn; Sarah C Flury; Kent T Perry; David C Mohr; Frank J Penedo Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2019-07-16 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Roderick C N van den Bergh; Ida J Korfage; Gerard J J M Borsboom; Ewout W Steyerberg; Marie-Louise Essink-Bot Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2009-08-09 Impact factor: 4.147