Sex differences and hormone influences on tyrosine hydroxylase immunoreactive cells in the leopard frog.

We examined sex differences in tyrosine hydroxylase immunoreactive (TH-ir) cell populations in the preoptic area (POA), suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), posterior tuberculum (TP), and caudal hypothalamus (Hy) in the leopard frog (Rana pipiens), in addition to the effects of natural variation in sex steroid hormones on these same populations in both sexes. All four of these populations have been shown to be dopaminergic. Gonadal sex, androgens, and estrogen all influenced TH-ir cell numbers, but in a complicated pattern of interactions. After factoring out the effects of sex steroids by multiple regression, TH-ir cell numbers in all four areas differed between the sexes, with males having a greater number of TH-ir cells. The influence of androgens and estrogen differed by region and sex of the animals. Androgens were the main influence on TH-ir cell numbers in the POA and SCN. Plasma androgen concentrations were positively correlated with TH-ir cell numbers in both areas in males. In females, androgen concentration was negatively correlated with TH-ir cell numbers in the POA; there was no significant relationship in the SCN in females. In the more caudal populations, estrogen (E2) levels were positively correlated with TH-ir cell numbers in the TP of both males and females. In the caudal hypothalamus, E2 levels were positively correlated with TH-ir cell numbers in females, but there was no significant correlation in males. The results indicate that gonadal sex imposes a baseline sex difference in the four TH-ir (dopamine) populations, resulting in a higher number of such cells in males. Individual and sex-linked differences in gonadal steroid hormones lead to variation around this baseline condition, with androgens having a greater influence on rostral populations and estrogen on caudal populations. Last, an individual's gonadal sex determines the effect that androgens and estrogen have on each population. Copyright 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Neurobiol 56: 54-65, 2003