Literature DB >> 12766685

Impact of somatosensory evoked potential monitoring on cervical surgery.

Theodoros Kombos1, Olaf Suess, Carlos Da Silva, Oczan Ciklatekerlio, Vera Nobis, Mario Brock.   

Abstract

Controversy still exists about the necessity of somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) monitoring during cervical surgery. The purpose of this prospective study is to determine the impact of SSEP monitoring on anterior cervical surgery. Intraoperative SSEP monitoring was performed in 100 patients treated by an anterior cervical approach. The patients were divided into three groups according to their preoperative clinical condition. Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring was performed during five stages of the procedure: M1, after the induction of anesthesia; M2, during positioning; M3, during distraction of the intervertebral space; M4, throughout decompression; and M5, during graft placement. Normal SSEPs were obtained during M1 from all the patients in group 2. Pathologic SSEPs were recorded at M1 in 45 patients from group 1. No SSEPs were recorded at M1 in six patients in group 3. A deterioration of the SSEPs was observed in 35 patients during M2. Deteriorated SSEPs were observed during M3 in 14 patients. No deterioration of the SSEPs was recorded during M4. Intraoperative SSEP monitoring is easy to perform and helps to increase safety during anterior cervical surgery. Critical phases of the surgical procedure were identified and the surgical strategy was modified as a result of this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12766685     DOI: 10.1097/00004691-200304000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0736-0258            Impact factor:   2.177


  7 in total

1.  A prospective study of the utility of preoperative somatosensory evoked potentials in spinal surgery.

Authors:  Y L Lo; Y F Dan; Y E Tan; S B Tan; C T Tan; S Raman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-01-26       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Risk factors for positioning-related somatosensory evoked potential changes in 3946 spinal surgeries.

Authors:  Samyuktha R Melachuri; Jeffrey R Balzer; Manasa K Melachuri; David Ninaci; Katherine Anetakis; Jaspreet Kaur; Donald J Crammond; Parthasarathy D Thirumala
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during complex spinal deformity cases in pediatric patients: methodology, utility, prognostication, and outcome.

Authors:  James Drake; Reinhard Zeller; Abhaya V Kulkarni; Samuel Strantzas; Laura Holmes
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2010-03-07       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  Monitoring rate and predictability of intraoperative monitoring in patients with intradural extramedullary and epidural metastatic spinal tumors.

Authors:  H Kang; H S Gwak; S H Shin; M K Woo; I H Jeong; H Yoo; J W Kwon; S H Lee
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 2.772

5.  Evoked potential monitoring identifies possible neurological injury during positioning for craniotomy.

Authors:  Zirka H Anastasian; Brian Ramnath; Ricardo J Komotar; Jeffrey N Bruce; Michael B Sisti; Edward J Gallo; Ronald G Emerson; Eric J Heyer
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  Combined expansive open-door laminoplasty with short-segment lateral mass instrumented fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy with short segment instability.

Authors:  Huan-Ming Tang; Kuang-Ting Yeh; Ru-Ping Lee; Ing-Ho Chen; Tzai-Chiu Yu; Kuan-Lin Liu; Cheng-Huan Peng; Jen-Hung Wang; Wen-Tien Wu
Journal:  Ci Ji Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2015-10-30

7.  Neurophysiological monitoring during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.

Authors:  Jee-Eun Kim; Jun-Soon Kim; Sejin Yang; Jongsuk Choi; Seung-Jae Hyun; Ki-Jeong Kim; Kyung Seok Park
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol Pract       Date:  2021-02-03
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.