| Literature DB >> 12766507 |
Rodolfo Ventura1, Stephan Willems, Christian Weiss, Joerg Flecke, Tim Risius, Thomas Rostock, Matthias Hoffmann, Thomas Meinertz.
Abstract
The most widely accepted criterion for successful radiofrequency catheter (RFC) ablation of typical atrial flutter is the development of bi-directional isthmus block. In a subset of patients, conventional RFC ablation fails to achieve this endpoint because deeper and wider lesions are required. We investigated the efficacy of a long 8-mm tip catheter in these cases. One hundred and seventy-four consecutive patients (137 male; 61 +/- 9 years) with recurrent typical atrial flutter underwent conventional RFC ablation first with a standard 4 mm tip catheter. In resistant cases (n = 52), ablation was continued using a large tip 8-mm catheter when the 4-mm tip catheter failed. Resistant atrial flutter was identified when 21 RFC pulses failed to reach the selected endpoint of bi-directional isthmus block or in cases of transient bi- directional block (at least 3 episodes). In 122 of the 174 patients (70%) conventional atrial flutter ablation was successfully performed with 13 +/- 5 RFC applications. In the remaining 52 subjects (30%), the ablation procedure was completed using the large tip electrode catheter. In 30 of these 52 patients (58%), the catheter was changed because of persistent intra-atrial conduction after 21 RFC pulses and in 22 (42%) because of intermittent conduction block after 11 +/- 5 applications. Using the large tip electrode catheter, the selected endpoint was achieved in all patients of both groups with 3 +/- 2 RFC pulses (power output of 50-60 W, pulse duration of 60 sec). No post-procedure complications were observed. After 15 +/- 5 months of follow-up, 16 patients (9%) had recurrence of atrial flutter. Five of the patients had been in the resistant group. In patients with atrial flutter resistant to conventional ablation therapy, the long tip (8-mm) catheter appears to be a safe and effective alternative to use of the conventional 4-mm tip catheter.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2003 PMID: 12766507 DOI: 10.1023/a:1023665002255
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol ISSN: 1383-875X Impact factor: 1.900