Literature DB >> 12765590

[Clinical management units in primary care: a question under debate].

M Alvarez Girón1, C García Gil, A Solano Parés.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To find the views of health professionals on how the terms of the new management agreement with clinical units affect the quality of health delivery.
DESIGN: Qualitative study to find professionals' views. Individual opinions of key informers were obtained, secondary sources were analysed and a discussion group rounded off the study. The categories for the analysis were established on the basis of the results obtained.
SETTING: Primary care districts in the provinces of Sevilla and Cádiz, in the Autonomous Community of Andalusia. Health districts of differing social-economic and geographical characteristics were chosen. PARTICIPANTS: 9 professionals involved in the new system of management. The selection criteria refer to the kind of professional, the unit or work team and the characteristics of the health district.
METHOD: The semi-structured interview with key informers and a discussion group were the basic techniques for gathering information.
RESULTS: A view that the clinical management units were designed as a savings strategy was detected. There were differences about primary care teams.
CONCLUSIONS: Professionals think there is too much rigidity and adding-up in the measurement of targets and objectives. This creates unfavourable working conditions, which affects the quality of health service delivery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12765590     DOI: 10.1016/s0212-6567(03)70725-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aten Primaria        ISSN: 0212-6567            Impact factor:   1.137


  1 in total

1.  [Usefulness of the budget and the balanced scorecard in managing Primary Care Centres. Impact on staff motivation].

Authors:  Juan Manuel Ramón-Jerónimo; Raquel Flórez-López; Natalia Domínguez-Lario
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 1.137

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.