Literature DB >> 12764659

Duplex ultrasound as first-line screening test for patients suspected of renal artery stenosis: prospective evaluation in high-risk group.

A Nchimi1, J F Biquet, D Brisbois, P Reginster, K Bouali, C Saive, P Magotteaux.   

Abstract

Our objective was to assess how far the progress in ultrasound devices has increased feasibility and accuracy of Duplex ultrasound (DUS) for the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis (RAS), in a population with high prevalence of atherosclerotic renovascular lesions. Ninety-one hypertensive patients with atherosclerotic disease were prospectively evaluated by both DUS and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) of the renal arteries. Only proximal criteria (peak systolic velocity >180 mm/s or renal-to-aortic ratio >3.5) were used for the diagnosis of significant RAS (>60% narrowing). For both techniques, two readers were involved for interobserver variability study. Two hundred one arteries were demonstrated by DSA on 182 available kidneys. The prevalence of RAS among the study group was 37%. Sixteen of the 19 accessory arteries were not seen at DUS; in 8 patients, one renal artery was not seen at DUS (feasibility 91%). On the 177 arteries assessed, in comparison with DSA, DUS yielded 96, 91, and 97% mean values of accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, respectively. Kappa for interobserver agreement was 0.95 for DUS and 0.92 for DSA. Although still unreliable for the detection of accessory arteries, DUS is in our experience an accurate and reproducible diagnostic test for RAS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12764659     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-002-1685-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  6 in total

1.  Renal artery entrapment by the diaphragmatic crus.

Authors:  F Thony; J-P Baguet; M Rodiere; C Sessa; B Janbon; G Ferretti
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-03-19       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Interventional radiologic techniques for screening, diagnosis and treatment of patients with renal artery stenosis.

Authors:  Richard H Marshall; Marc H Schiffman; Ronald S Winokur; Adam D Talenfeld; David N Siegel
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Renal artery stenosis: comparative evaluation of gadolinium-enhanced MRA and DSA.

Authors:  F Stacul; S Gava; M Belgrano; S Cernic; L Pagnan; F Pozzi Mucelli; M A Cova
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Left main renal artery entrapment by diaphragmatic crura: spiral CT angiography.

Authors:  S Singham; P Murugasu; J Macintosh; P Murugasu; A Deshpande
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2010-04-01

5.  Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of Doppler USG and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and selective renal arteriography in patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis.

Authors:  Kenan Turgutalp; Ahmet Kiykim; Onur Özhan; Ilter Helvaci; Türkay Ozcan; Altan Yildiz
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2013-06-19

6.  Optimal Blood Suppression Inversion Time Based on Breathing Rates and Heart Rates to Improve Renal Artery Visibility in Spatial Labeling with Multiple Inversion Pulses: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Yigang Pei; Fang Li; Hao Shen; Xueying Long; Hui Liu; Xiaoyi Wang; Jinkang Liu; Wenzheng Li
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 3.500

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.