Literature DB >> 12763459

Biocompatibility of implantable synthetic polymeric drug carriers: focus on brain biocompatibility.

E Fournier1, C Passirani, C N Montero-Menei, J P Benoit.   

Abstract

Numerous polymeric biomaterials are implanted each year in human bodies. Among them, drug delivery devices are potent novel powerful therapeutics for diseases which lack efficient treatments. Controlled release systems are in direct and sustained contact with the tissues, and some of them degrade in situ. Thus, both the material itself and its degradation products must be devoid of toxicity. The knowledge and understanding of the criteria and mechanisms determining the biocompatibility of biomaterials are therefore of great importance. The classical tissue response to a foreign material leads to the encapsulation of the implant, which may impair the drug diffusion in the surrounding tissue and/or cause implant failure. This tissue response depends on different factors, especially on the implantation site. Indeed, several organs possess a particular immunological status, which may reduce the inflammatory and immune reactions. Among them, the central nervous system is of particular interest, since many pathologies still need curative treatments. This review describes the classical foreign body reaction and exposes the particularities of the central nervous system response. The recent in vivo biocompatibility studies of implanted synthetic polymeric drug carriers are summarized in order to illustrate the behavior of different classes of polymers and the methodologies used to evaluate their tolerance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12763459     DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00161-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  58 in total

Review 1.  Growth factor delivery-based tissue engineering: general approaches and a review of recent developments.

Authors:  Kangwon Lee; Eduardo A Silva; David J Mooney
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Species and density of implant surface chemistry affect the extent of foreign body reactions.

Authors:  Ashwin Nair; Ling Zou; Dhiman Bhattacharyya; Richard B Timmons; Liping Tang
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2008-01-12       Impact factor: 3.882

3.  Towards more realistic in vitro release measurement techniques for biodegradable microparticles.

Authors:  D Klose; N Azaroual; F Siepmann; G Vermeersch; J Siepmann
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 4.  Surface chemistry influences implant biocompatibility.

Authors:  Paul Thevenot; Wenjing Hu; Liping Tang
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 5.  Biomaterials for the central nervous system.

Authors:  Yinghui Zhong; Ravi V Bellamkonda
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-09-06       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 6.  Biomaterials/tissue interactions: possible solutions to overcome foreign body response.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Morais; Fotios Papadimitrakopoulos; Diane J Burgess
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 4.009

7.  In situ gelable interpenetrating double network hydrogel formulated from binary components: thiolated chitosan and oxidized dextran.

Authors:  Hanwei Zhang; Aisha Qadeer; Weiliam Chen
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 6.988

8.  A review of the biocompatibility of implantable devices: current challenges to overcome foreign body response.

Authors:  Yoshinori Onuki; Upkar Bhardwaj; Fotios Papadimitrakopoulos; Diane J Burgess
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-11

9.  Antibacterial and anticancerous drug loading kinetics for (10-x)CuO-xZnO-20CaO-60SiO2-10P2O5 (2 ≤ x ≤ 8) mesoporous bioactive glasses.

Authors:  Shikha Garg; Swati Thakur; Aayush Gupta; Gurbinder Kaur; Om Prakash Pandey
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 3.896

10.  Interfacing Sca-1(pos) mesenchymal stem cells with biocompatible scaffolds with different chemical composition and geometry.

Authors:  G Forte; O Franzese; S Pagliari; F Pagliari; A M Di Francesco; P Cossa; A Laudisi; R Fiaccavento; M Minieri; E Bonmassar; P Di Nardo
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2009-07-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.