Literature DB >> 12763088

Spontaneous field potentials influence the activity of neocortical neurons during paroxysmal activities in vivo.

F Grenier1, I Timofeev, S Crochet, M Steriade.   

Abstract

Field-potential recordings with macroelectrodes, and extra- and intracellular potentials with micropipettes were used to determine the influence of spontaneous field potentials on the activity of neocortical neurons during seizures. In vivo experiments were carried out in cats under anesthesia. Strong negative field fluctuations of up to 20 mV were associated with electroencephalogram "spikes" during spontaneously occurring paroxysmal activities. During paroxysmal events, action potentials displayed an unexpected behavior: a more hyperpolarized firing threshold and smaller amplitude than during normal activity, as determined with intracellular recordings referenced to a distant ground. Considering the transmembrane potential (the difference between extra- and intracellular potential) qualified this observation: firing threshold determined from the transmembrane potential did not decrease, and smaller action-potential amplitude was associated with depolarized firing threshold. The hyperpolarization of intracellular firing threshold was thus related to the field potentials. Similar field-potential effects on neuronal activities were observed when the paroxysmal events included very fast oscillations or ripples (80-200 Hz) that represent rapid fluctuations of field potentials (up to 5 mV in <5 ms). Neuronal firing was phase-locked to those oscillations. These results demonstrate that: (a) strong spontaneous field potentials influence neuronal behavior, and thus play an active role during paroxysmal activities; and (b) transmembrane potentials have to be used to accurately describe the behavior of neurons in conditions in which field potentials fluctuate strongly. Since neuronal activity is presumably the main generator of field potentials, and in return these potentials may increase neuronal excitability, we propose that this constitutes a positive feedback loop that is involved in the development and spread of paroxysmal activities, and that a similar feedback loop is involved in the generation of neocortical ripples. We propose a mechanism for seizure initiation involving these phenomena.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12763088     DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4522(03)00101-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  9 in total

1.  Focal generation of paroxysmal fast runs during electrographic seizures.

Authors:  Sofiane Boucetta; Sylvain Chauvette; Maxim Bazhenov; Igor Timofeev
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 5.864

2.  Endogenous electric fields may guide neocortical network activity.

Authors:  Flavio Fröhlich; David A McCormick
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Human and automated detection of high-frequency oscillations in clinical intracranial EEG recordings.

Authors:  Andrew B Gardner; Greg A Worrell; Eric Marsh; Dennis Dlugos; Brian Litt
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-03-23       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Periodic Lateralized Epileptiform Discharges and Afterdischarges: Common Dynamic Mechanisms.

Authors:  Giridhar P Kalamangalam; Jeremy D Slater
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.177

5.  Field effects in the CNS play functional roles.

Authors:  Shennan A Weiss; Donald S Faber
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 3.492

6.  Dynamic mechanisms underlying afterdischarge: a human subdural recording study.

Authors:  Giridhar P Kalamangalam; Nitin Tandon; Jeremy D Slater
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Resilience of developing brain networks to interictal epileptiform discharges is associated with cognitive outcome.

Authors:  George M Ibrahim; Daniel Cassel; Benjamin R Morgan; Mary Lou Smith; Hiroshi Otsubo; Ayako Ochi; Margot Taylor; James T Rutka; O Carter Snead; Sam Doesburg
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 8.  Mechanisms of physiological and epileptic HFO generation.

Authors:  John G R Jefferys; Liset Menendez de la Prida; Fabrice Wendling; Anatol Bragin; Massimo Avoli; Igor Timofeev; Fernando H Lopes da Silva
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 11.685

Review 9.  Field effects and ictal synchronization: insights from in homine observations.

Authors:  Shennan A Weiss; Guy McKhann; Robert Goodman; Ronald G Emerson; Andrew Trevelyan; Marom Bikson; Catherine A Schevon
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 3.169

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.