Literature DB >> 12761671

Experimental evidence for physical cues involved in oviposition site selection of lotic hydrobiosid caddis flies.

Paul Reich1, Barbara J Downes.   

Abstract

Cues involved in determining the distribution of invertebrate propagules within a stream landscape contribute greatly to our knowledge of the supply and arrangement of new recruits and thus an improved understanding of factors that might ultimately affect population parameters. Previous observations indicated that both current velocity and rock size were important determinants of the egg mass distribution of certain hydrobiosid caddis flies that lay their eggs in single masses beneath emergent rocks. These observations were tested experimentally in a temperate, upland Australian stream. Manipulations of current speed confirmed that females of Ulmerochorema sp. and the Taschorema complex deposited more eggs on rocks in elevated current speeds (>0.40 ms(-1)) whereas Apsilochorema sp. deposited more eggs on rocks in slow currents (<0.30 ms(-1)). This latter result did not coincide with previous observational data. The anomaly between observational and experimental data, however, was reconciled by the outcome of a further experiment that tested the influence of the emergent or 'landing pad' size of rocks as the abundance of Apsilochorema egg masses increased with landing pad size independent of the prevailing flow conditions. Landing pad size did not influence the abundance of egg masses of Taschorema or Ulmerochorema. Patterns of female visits to rocks indicated that taxa might distinguish between favoured egg-laying sites prior to landing on rocks. Large aggregations of adult male and female Ulmerochorema collected from rocks favoured for oviposition provide indirect evidence for mating induced swarming behaviour associated with oviposition site selection. This study provides a framework for more sophisticated questions relating to the influence of oviposition site selection on structuring populations of lotic macroinvertebrates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12761671     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-003-1284-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  9 in total

1.  Relative response to colored substrates by ovipositing blackflies (Diptera: Simuliidae). I. Oviposition by Simulium (Simulium) verecundum Stone and Jamnback.

Authors:  V I Golini; D M Davies
Journal:  Can J Zool       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 1.597

2.  Reflection-polarization patterns at flat water surfaces and their relevance for insect polarization vision

Authors: 
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1995-07-07       Impact factor: 2.691

3.  Female's preference for oviposition site and larval performance in the water-lily beetle, Galerucella nymphaeae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae).

Authors:  Jari Kouki
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  HERITABILITY OF OVIPOSITION PREFERENCE AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO OFFSPRING PERFORMANCE WITHIN A SINGLE INSECT POPULATION.

Authors:  M C Singer; D Ng; C D Thomas
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Substrate selection by Carabus clatratus (Coleoptera, Carabidae) and its consequences for offspring development.

Authors:  T Huk; Bettina Kühne
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Hydrologic and behavioral constraints on oviposition of stream insects: implications for adult dispersal.

Authors:  Barbara L Peckarsky; Brad W Taylor; Christopher C Caudill
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Interaction of the Culex quinquefasciatus egg raft pheromone with a natural chemical associated with oviposition sites.

Authors:  J G Millar; J D Chaney; J W Beehler; M S Mulla
Journal:  J Am Mosq Control Assoc       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 0.917

8.  Oviposition specificity and behavior of the watermilfoil specialist Euhrychiopsis lecontei.

Authors:  Susan L Solarz; Raymond M Newman
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Why do mayflies lay their eggs en masse on dry asphalt roads? Water-imitating polarized light reflected from asphalt attracts Ephemeroptera.

Authors:  G Kriska; G Horváth; S Andrikovics
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.312

  9 in total
  8 in total

1.  Environmental constraints on oviposition limit egg supply of a stream insect at multiple scales.

Authors:  Jill Lancaster; Barbara J Downes; Amanda Arnold
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Oviposition site selection in a complex and variable environment: the role of habitat quality and conspecific cues.

Authors:  Volker H W Rudolf; Mark-Oliver Rödel
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-10-22       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Selective oviposition of the mayfly Baetis bicaudatus.

Authors:  Andrea C Encalada; Barbara L Peckarsky
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-02-23       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Distribution and oviposition site selection by predatory mites in the presence of intraguild predators.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Choh; Maurice W Sabelis; Arne Janssen
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.132

5.  Avoidance and aggregation create consistent egg distribution patterns of congeneric caddisflies across spatially variable oviposition landscapes.

Authors:  Jill Lancaster; Barbara J Downes; Rebecca E Lester; Stephen P Rice
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Glass buildings on river banks as "polarized light traps" for mass-swarming polarotactic caddis flies.

Authors:  György Kriska; Péter Malik; Ildikó Szivák; Gábor Horváth
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2008-02-06

7.  Regulation of open populations of a stream insect through larval density dependence.

Authors:  Angus R McIntosh; Hamish S Greig; Simon Howard
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2022-04-09       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  The predatory bug Orius strigicollis shows a preference for egg-laying sites based on plant topography.

Authors:  Chendi Yu; Jun Huang; Xiaoyun Ren; G Mandela Fernández-Grandon; Xiaowei Li; Muhammad Hafeez; Yaobin Lu
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 2.984

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.