OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility and acceptability of academic detailing in general practice in the North-East-Flanders region of Belgium. METHODS: All local quality groups in the study region were randomly allocated to either (1) two academic detailing visits to the individual members or (2) two academic detailing visits during the meetings of the local quality group. During these visits, the results of a systematic review of the literature on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDs) were presented. RESULTS: Of 14 local quality groups, 12 allocated to the individual intervention agreed to participate. Of the 184 physicians invited to receive an academic detailer, 142 had two visits on NSAIDs. One hundred and five physicians gave their opinion on the visits by means of a questionnaire. The great majority of the responders (90%) wished to receive an academic detailer on other topics in the future, with a frequency of two visits per year. Of 13 local quality groups, 12 allocated to the group intervention, with a total number of 192 physicians who agreed to participate. Ten local quality groups with 166 members received the information on NSAIDs. The actual attendance rate per intervention session was approximately two out of three physicians. All 166 physicians of the participating local quality groups were offered an evaluation form, and 79 responded. Of the responders who received the full group intervention, 88% wished to have more academic detailing visits on other topics in their local quality group. A comparison between the evaluation forms of the individual and the group intervention revealed no major differences concerning the acceptability of the intervention. CONCLUSION: The pilot study showed that academic detailing is feasible in the North-East-Flanders region of Belgium. Both the individual visits and the visits to the local quality groups were rated positively, and a majority of the general practitioners who returned the evaluation questionnaire wished to receive such visits in the future. The structure of the local quality groups implies limitations to the practical organisation of a visit, but requires less time investment than individual visits.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility and acceptability of academic detailing in general practice in the North-East-Flanders region of Belgium. METHODS: All local quality groups in the study region were randomly allocated to either (1) two academic detailing visits to the individual members or (2) two academic detailing visits during the meetings of the local quality group. During these visits, the results of a systematic review of the literature on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDs) were presented. RESULTS: Of 14 local quality groups, 12 allocated to the individual intervention agreed to participate. Of the 184 physicians invited to receive an academic detailer, 142 had two visits on NSAIDs. One hundred and five physicians gave their opinion on the visits by means of a questionnaire. The great majority of the responders (90%) wished to receive an academic detailer on other topics in the future, with a frequency of two visits per year. Of 13 local quality groups, 12 allocated to the group intervention, with a total number of 192 physicians who agreed to participate. Ten local quality groups with 166 members received the information on NSAIDs. The actual attendance rate per intervention session was approximately two out of three physicians. All 166 physicians of the participating local quality groups were offered an evaluation form, and 79 responded. Of the responders who received the full group intervention, 88% wished to have more academic detailing visits on other topics in their local quality group. A comparison between the evaluation forms of the individual and the group intervention revealed no major differences concerning the acceptability of the intervention. CONCLUSION: The pilot study showed that academic detailing is feasible in the North-East-Flanders region of Belgium. Both the individual visits and the visits to the local quality groups were rated positively, and a majority of the general practitioners who returned the evaluation questionnaire wished to receive such visits in the future. The structure of the local quality groups implies limitations to the practical organisation of a visit, but requires less time investment than individual visits.
Authors: N Freemantle; M Eccles; J Wood; J Mason; I Nazareth; C Duggan; P Young; A Haines; M Drummond; I Russell; T Walley Journal: Control Clin Trials Date: 1999-10
Authors: K F Ilett; S Johnson; G Greenhill; L Mullen; J Brockis; C L Golledge; D B Reid Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2000-02 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: G T Yeo; S P de Burgh; T Letton; J Shaw; N Donnelly; M E Swinburn; S Phillips; C Bridges-Webb; A Mant Journal: Fam Pract Date: 1994-03 Impact factor: 2.267
Authors: William J Curry; Eugene J Lengerich; Brenda C Kluhsman; Marie A Graybill; Jason Z Liao; Eric W Schaefer; Angela M Spleen; Mark B Dignan Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2011-05-23 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Sherri Sheinfeld Gorin; Alfred R Ashford; Rafael Lantigua; Manisha Desai; Andrea Troxel; Donald Gemson Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2007-12-17 Impact factor: 7.327