MOTIVATION: There is a very large and growing level of effort toward improving the platforms, experiment designs, and data analysis methods for microarray expression profiling. Along with a growing richness in the approaches there is a growing confusion among most scientists as to how to make objective comparisons and choices between them for different applications. There is a need for a standard framework for the microarray community to compare and improve analytical and statistical methods. RESULTS: We report on a microarray data set comprising 204 in-situ synthesized oligonucleotide arrays, each hybridized with two-color cDNA samples derived from 20 different human tissues and cell lines. Design of the approximately 24 000 60mer oligonucleotides that report approximately 2500 known genes on the arrays, and design of the hybridization experiments, were carried out in a way that supports the performance assessment of alternative data processing approaches and of alternative experiment and array designs. We also propose standard figures of merit for success in detecting individual differential expression changes or expression levels, and for detecting similarities and differences in expression patterns across genes and experiments. We expect this data set and the proposed figures of merit will provide a standard framework for much of the microarray community to compare and improve many analytical and statistical methods relevant to microarray data analysis, including image processing, normalization, error modeling, combining of multiple reporters per gene, use of replicate experiments, and sample referencing schemes in measurements based on expression change. AVAILABILITY/SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Expression data and supplementary information are available at http://www.rii.com/publications/2003/HE_SDS.htm
MOTIVATION: There is a very large and growing level of effort toward improving the platforms, experiment designs, and data analysis methods for microarray expression profiling. Along with a growing richness in the approaches there is a growing confusion among most scientists as to how to make objective comparisons and choices between them for different applications. There is a need for a standard framework for the microarray community to compare and improve analytical and statistical methods. RESULTS: We report on a microarray data set comprising 204 in-situ synthesized oligonucleotide arrays, each hybridized with two-color cDNA samples derived from 20 different human tissues and cell lines. Design of the approximately 24 000 60mer oligonucleotides that report approximately 2500 known genes on the arrays, and design of the hybridization experiments, were carried out in a way that supports the performance assessment of alternative data processing approaches and of alternative experiment and array designs. We also propose standard figures of merit for success in detecting individual differential expression changes or expression levels, and for detecting similarities and differences in expression patterns across genes and experiments. We expect this data set and the proposed figures of merit will provide a standard framework for much of the microarray community to compare and improve many analytical and statistical methods relevant to microarray data analysis, including image processing, normalization, error modeling, combining of multiple reporters per gene, use of replicate experiments, and sample referencing schemes in measurements based on expression change. AVAILABILITY/SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Expression data and supplementary information are available at http://www.rii.com/publications/2003/HE_SDS.htm
Authors: Xia Yang; Bin Zhang; Cliona Molony; Eugene Chudin; Ke Hao; Jun Zhu; Andrea Gaedigk; Christine Suver; Hua Zhong; J Steven Leeder; F Peter Guengerich; Stephen C Strom; Erin Schuetz; Thomas H Rushmore; Roger G Ulrich; J Greg Slatter; Eric E Schadt; Andrew Kasarskis; Pek Yee Lum Journal: Genome Res Date: 2010-06-10 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Ping Wang; John A Dawson; Mark P Keller; Brian S Yandell; Nancy A Thornberry; Bei B Zhang; I-Ming Wang; Eric E Schadt; Alan D Attie; C Kendziorski Journal: Genetics Date: 2010-11-29 Impact factor: 4.562
Authors: Eric E Schadt; John Lamb; Xia Yang; Jun Zhu; Steve Edwards; Debraj Guhathakurta; Solveig K Sieberts; Stephanie Monks; Marc Reitman; Chunsheng Zhang; Pek Yee Lum; Amy Leonardson; Rolf Thieringer; Joseph M Metzger; Liming Yang; John Castle; Haoyuan Zhu; Shera F Kash; Thomas A Drake; Alan Sachs; Aldons J Lusis Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2005-06-19 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Mark P Keller; YounJeong Choi; Ping Wang; Dawn Belt Davis; Mary E Rabaglia; Angie T Oler; Donald S Stapleton; Carmen Argmann; Kathy L Schueler; Steve Edwards; H Adam Steinberg; Elias Chaibub Neto; Robert Kleinhanz; Scott Turner; Marc K Hellerstein; Eric E Schadt; Brian S Yandell; Christina Kendziorski; Alan D Attie Journal: Genome Res Date: 2008-03-17 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Sven Duenwald; Mingjie Zhou; Yanqun Wang; Serguei Lejnine; Amit Kulkarni; Jaime Graves; Ryan Smith; John Castle; George Tokiwa; Bernard Fine; Hongyue Dai; Thomas Fare; Matthew Marton Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2009-07-28 Impact factor: 5.531
Authors: Mark L Parrish; Chris Wright; Yarek Rivers; David Argilla; Heather Collins; Brendan Leeson; Andrey Loboda; Michael Nebozhyn; Matthew J Marton; Serguei Lejnine Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2010-09-25 Impact factor: 5.531
Authors: Radu Dobrin; Jun Zhu; Cliona Molony; Carmen Argman; Mark L Parrish; Sonia Carlson; Mark F Allan; Daniel Pomp; Eric E Schadt Journal: Genome Biol Date: 2009-05-22 Impact factor: 13.583
Authors: Albert Mascarell-Creus; Joaquin Cañizares; Josep Vilarrasa-Blasi; Santiago Mora-García; José Blanca; Daniel Gonzalez-Ibeas; Montserrat Saladié; Cristina Roig; Wim Deleu; Belén Picó-Silvent; Nuria López-Bigas; Miguel A Aranda; Jordi Garcia-Mas; Fernando Nuez; Pere Puigdomènech; Ana I Caño-Delgado Journal: BMC Genomics Date: 2009-10-12 Impact factor: 3.969
Authors: Xia Yang; Joshua L Deignan; Hongxiu Qi; Jun Zhu; Su Qian; Judy Zhong; Gevork Torosyan; Sana Majid; Brie Falkard; Robert R Kleinhanz; Jenny Karlsson; Lawrence W Castellani; Sheena Mumick; Kai Wang; Tao Xie; Michael Coon; Chunsheng Zhang; Daria Estrada-Smith; Charles R Farber; Susanna S Wang; Atila van Nas; Anatole Ghazalpour; Bin Zhang; Douglas J Macneil; John R Lamb; Katrina M Dipple; Marc L Reitman; Margarete Mehrabian; Pek Y Lum; Eric E Schadt; Aldons J Lusis; Thomas A Drake Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2009-03-08 Impact factor: 38.330