Literature DB >> 12760998

The effect of hypothermia on myogenic motor-evoked potentials to electrical stimulation with a single pulse and a train of pulses under propofol/ketamine/fentanyl anesthesia in rabbits.

Takanori Sakamoto1, Masahiko Kawaguchi, Meiko Kakimoto, Satoki Inoue, Masahiro Takahashi, Hitoshi Furuya.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: In the present study, we investigated the effect of hypothermia on myogenic motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in rabbits. The influence of stimulation paradigms to induce MEPs was evaluated. Twelve rabbits anesthetized with ketamine, fentanyl, and propofol were used for the study. Myogenic MEPs in response to electrical stimulation of the motor cortex with a single pulse and a train of three and five pulses were recorded from the soleus muscle. After the control recording of MEPs at 38 degrees C of esophageal temperature, the rabbits were cooled by surface cooling. Esophageal temperature was maintained at 35 degrees C, 32 degrees C, 30 degrees C, and 28 degrees C, and MEPs were recorded at each point. MEP amplitude to single- pulse stimulation was significantly reduced with a re-duction of core temperature to 28 degrees C compared with the control value at 38 degrees C (0.8 +/- 0.4 mV versus 2.3 +/- 0.3 mV; P < 0.05), whereas MEP amplitude to train-pulse stimulation did not change significantly during the cooling. MEP latency was increased linearly with a reduction of core temperature regardless of stimulation paradigms. In conclusion, these results indicate that a reduction of core temperature to 28 degrees C did not influence MEP amplitudes as long as a train of pulses, but not a single pulse, was used for stimulation in rabbits under propofol/ketamine/fentanyl anesthesia. IMPLICATIONS: Intraoperative monitoring of myogenic motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) may be required under hypothermic conditions because of its neuroprotective efficacy. However, data on the influence of hypothermia on myogenic MEPs are limited. The results indicate that multipulse stimulation may be better than single-pulse stimulation when monitoring MEPs during hypothermia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12760998     DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000064202.24119.07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  6 in total

1.  Improvement of motor evoked potentials monitoring is required during thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm surgery under hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  Masahiko Kawaguchi; Mikito Kawamata; Yoshitsugu Yamada
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Changes of motor evoked potentials during descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic surgery with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest.

Authors:  Masahide Shinzawa; Kenji Yoshitani; Kenji Minatoya; Tomoya Irie; Hitoshi Ogino; Yoshihiko Ohnishi
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Assessment of intraoperative motor evoked potentials for predicting postoperative paraplegia in thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Toshinori Horiuchi; Masahiko Kawaguchi; Satoki Inoue; Hironobu Hayashi; Ryuichi Abe; Nobuoki Tabayashi; Shigeki Taniguchi; Hitoshi Furuya
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2010-11-27       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  Prolonged loss of leg myogenic motor evoked potentials during thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair, without postoperative paraplegia.

Authors:  Sadahei Denda; Miki Taneoka; Hiroyuki Honda; Yukiko Watanabe; Hidekazu Imai; Yasushi Kitahara
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 5.  Current approach on spinal cord monitoring: the point of view of the neurologist, the anesthesiologist and the spine surgeon.

Authors:  Thomas N Pajewski; Vincent Arlet; Lawrence H Phillips
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Continuous intravenous anaesthesia with sufentanil and midazolam in medetomidine premedicated New Zealand White rabbits.

Authors:  Patricia Hedenqvist; Anna Edner; Åsa Fahlman; Marianne Jensen-Waern
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 2.741

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.