Literature DB >> 12760990

Effect-site concentration of propofol for recovery of consciousness is virtually independent of fentanyl effect-site concentration.

Hiroko Iwakiri1, Osamu Nagata, Takashi Matsukawa, Makoto Ozaki, Daniel I Sessler.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Fentanyl reduces the amount of propofol necessary to prevent responses to surgical stimuli. However, opioids have relatively little effect on consciousness. We, therefore, tested the hypothesis that fentanyl minimally alters the effect-site concentration of propofol associated with awakening. Fifty women having gynecologic laparotomy with propofol anesthesia were randomly allocated into the following target effect-site fentanyl concentrations: 0.8, 1.0, 1.4, 2.0, and 3.0 ng/mL. Fentanyl was continued at the designated rate through the initial postoperative phase. The propofol effect-site concentration associated with eye opening in response to verbal command was regarded as the awakening concentration. The estimated propofol effect-site concentrations at awakening did not differ significantly among the groups and were 1.9 +/- 0.5 micro g/mL with a fentanyl effect-site concentration of 0.8 ng/mL; 1.6 +/- 0.4 micro g/mL with 1.0 ng/mL of fentanyl; 1.6 +/- 0.2 micro g/mL with 1.4 ng/mL of fentanyl; 1.7 +/- 0.4 micro g/mL with 2.0 ng/mL of fentanyl; and 1.6 +/- 0.34 micro g/mL with 3.0 ng/mL of fentanyl (mean +/- SD). Seventy percent of the subjects in the 0.8 ng/mL fentanyl group spontaneously complained of pain, whereas none of the patients in the 2 or 3 ng/mL groups did. Five (56%) of 9 women in the 3 ng/mL group had a postoperative respiratory rate <6 breaths/min. Heart rate in one of these women decreased to <40 bpm. These data suggest that the optimal fentanyl effect-site concentration in patients recovering from gynecologic laparoscopy is between 1.4 and 2.0 ng/mL. IMPLICATIONS: The effect-site concentration for propofol at awakening was virtually independent of the fentanyl effect-site concentration over the range of 0.8 to 3.0 ng/mL; however, 0.8 ng/mL of fentanyl was associated with inadequate postoperative analgesia, and 3.0 ng/mL of fentanyl was associated with respiratory toxicity. The optimal postoperative fentanyl effect-site concentration during recovery from propofol general anesthesia for laparotomy thus appears to be near 2 ng/mL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12760990     DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000062772.28479.2b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  6 in total

1.  Can age-related mitochondrial dysfunction affect volatile anesthetic potency?

Authors:  Michiaki Yamakage
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2014-08-24       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Remifentanil use for cesarean section in a patient with intracranial re-ruptured arteriovenous malformation.

Authors:  Eiko Onishi; Akiko Kojima; Toshio Saishu; Shin Kurosawa
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2011-12-11       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  A pharmacodynamic analysis of factors affecting recovery from anesthesia with propofol-remifentanil target controlled infusion.

Authors:  Bon-Nyeo Koo; Jeong-Rim Lee; Gyu-Jeong Noh; Jae-Hoon Lee; Young-Ran Kang; Dong-Woo Han
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 6.150

4.  Individual effect-site concentrations of propofol are similar at loss of consciousness and at awakening.

Authors:  Hiroko Iwakiri; Noboru Nishihara; Osamu Nagata; Takashi Matsukawa; Makoto Ozaki; Daniel I Sessler
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  The effect of dexmedetomidine on the adjuvant propofol requirement and intraoperative hemodynamics during remifentanil-based anesthesia.

Authors:  Woon-Seok Kang; Sung-Yun Kim; Jong-Chan Son; Ju-Deok Kim; Hasmizy Bin Muhammad; Seong-Hyop Kim; Tae-Gyoon Yoon; Tae-Yop Kim
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2012-02-20

6.  Comparison of sodium diclofenac, ketamine and propofol with fentanyl and midazolam in balanced anaesthesia.

Authors:  Mozaffar Rabiee; Ebrahim Alijanpour; Ali Jabbari; Farzan Khirkhah; Yousof Mortazavi; Ali Bijani
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2011 Jul-Dec
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.