Literature DB >> 127601

Echocardiographic left ventricular dimensions in pressure and volume overload. Their use in assessing aortic stenosis.

D H Bennett, D W Evans, M V Raj.   

Abstract

Left ventricular 'relative wall thickness', determined from the ratio between echocardiographic measurements of end-systolic wall thickness and cavity transverse dimension, was related to peak systolic intraventricular pressure in 15 normal subjects, in 15 patients with left ventricular volume or pressure overload without aortic stenosis, and in 23 patients with aortic stenosis. All these patients had a mean rate of circumferential fibre shortening greater than 1.0 circumference per second and were regarded as having good ventricular function. Relative wall thickness was found to be normal in cases of volume overload and to be increased in pressure overload, being proportional to the systolic intraventricular pressure. Values for the ratio of systolic intraventricular pressure to relative wall thickness in the normal subjects and patients without aortic stenosis were similar (mean 30 +/- 2.5). Based on this relation, estimates of peak systolic intraventricular pressure were made in the cases of aortic stenosis using the formula: systolic intraventricular pressure (kPa) equals 30 x wall thicknes divided by transverse dimension. Peak systolic aortic value gradients derived by subtracting brachial artery systolic pressure, measured by sphygmomanometer, from the echocardiographic estimates of intraventricular pressure compared favourably with the gradients measured at left heart catheterization (r equals 0.87, P less than 0.001). Aortic value orifice areas, derived from echocardiographic estimates of stroke volume, ejection time, and value gradient, ranged from 0.21 to 3.16 cm2 and appeared to correlate with the severity of aortic stenosis. All patients with aortic stenosis, with or without coexistent mild aortic regurgitation, who were recommended for aortic valve surgery, had estimated valve orifice areas of less than 0.8 cm2. A further 10 patients with pressure or volume overload had mean rates of circumferential fibre shortening of less than 1.0 circumference per second and were regarded as having poor ventricular function. In these cases values for relative wall thickness were lower than in those with good ventricular function and were not proportional to systolic intraventricular pressure. In patients with good left ventricular function systolic intraventricular pressure is proportional to, and can be estimated from, echocardiographic measurement of relative wall thickness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1975        PMID: 127601      PMCID: PMC482905          DOI: 10.1136/hrt.37.9.971

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Heart J        ISSN: 0007-0769


  25 in total

1.  Proceedings: Echocardiographic estimation of the sytolic pressure gradient in aortic stenosis.

Authors:  D H Bennett; D W Evans; M V Raj
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1975-05

2.  Dynamics of the circulation in aortic valvular disease.

Authors:  R GORLIN; I K McMILLAN; W E MEDD; M B MATTHEWS; R DALEY
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1955-06       Impact factor: 4.965

3.  Hydraulic formula for calculation of the area of the stenotic mitral valve, other cardiac valves, and central circulatory shunts. I.

Authors:  R GORLIN; S G GORLIN
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1951-01       Impact factor: 4.749

4.  Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular function with special reference to normalized velocities.

Authors:  M A Quinones; W H Gaasch; J K Alexander
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Asymmetric septal hypertrophy. Echocardiographic identification of the pathognomonic anatomic abnormality of IHSS.

Authors:  W L Henry; C E Clark; S E Epstein
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1973-02       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Estimation of left ventricular size by echocardiography.

Authors:  D G Gibson
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1973-02

7.  Comparison of ultrasound and cineangiographic measurements of left ventricular performance in patients with and without wall motion abnormalities.

Authors:  P Ludbrook; J S Karliner; K Peterson; G Leopold; R A O'Rourke
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1973-10

8.  Comparison of ultrasound and cineangiographic measurements of the mean rate of circumferential fiber shortening in man.

Authors:  R H Cooper; R A O'Rourke; J S Karliner; K L Peterson; G R Leopold
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Simplified estimation of aortic valve area.

Authors:  R J Bache; C R Jorgensen; Y Wang
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1972-04

10.  Evaluation of left ventricular function by echocardiography.

Authors:  N J Fortuin; W P Hood; E Craige
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  13 in total

1.  Comparison of electrocardiographic and echocardiographic measures of left ventricular hypertrophy in the assessment of aortic stenosis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1986-07

2.  Assessing the severity of valve stenosis.

Authors:  O Odemuyiwa; R J Hall
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1986-02

3.  Preoperative prediction of prosthesis size using cross sectional echocardiography in patients requiring aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  A Mackay; M Been; E Rodrigues; J Murchison; D P de Bono
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1985-05

4.  Prediction of left ventricular pressure in infants with aortic stenosis.

Authors:  J I Brenner; K R Baker; M A Berman
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1980-10

5.  A pilot study on left ventricular dimensions and wall stress before and after submaximal exercise.

Authors:  N S Cahill; M O'Brien; A Rodahl; J F Allen; D Knight; C Dolphin
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 6.  Assessment of chronic aortic valve disease in adults.

Authors:  A D Harries; B E Griffiths
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 2.401

7.  Precordial catch syndrome.

Authors:  D Pickering
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  The ECG in aortic stenosis. Value of TAVF and QV6.

Authors:  R S Fowler; M M Wood; H Bain; R G Patel; G G Sandor; R D Rowe
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.655

9.  Coexistence of asymmetric septal hypertrophy and aortic valve disease in adults.

Authors:  M V Raj; V Srinivas; I M Graham; D W Evans
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 9.139

10.  Comparison of electrocardiographic and echocardiographic measures of left ventricular hypertrophy in the assessment of aortic stenosis.

Authors:  M Dancy
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1986-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.