Literature DB >> 12759836

Phacoemulsification and thermal wound injury.

Kimberly C Sippel1, Roberto Pineda.   

Abstract

The technique of lens nucleus phacoemulsification has revolutionized cataract surgery. However, the production of ultrasound energy is associated with heat generation that can result in damage to ocular tissue, in particular the corneoscleral wound site. Thermal damage to the corneoscleral wound site may result in difficulty with wound closure and consequent risk of wound leakage, as well as damage to the adjacent corneal stroma and endothelium, fistula formation, and the induction of high degrees of post-operative astigmatism. The loss of adequate flow of irrigation fluid around the phacoemulsification tip is the key factor in the development of phacoemulsification-induced thermal injury. Use of excessive ultrasound power and production of excessive frictional forces generated by contact of the vibrating phacoemulsification needle with the irrigation sleeve are also factors involved. In the event of a "phacoburn," a specialized "gape suture" may help minimize surgically-induced astigmatism. The degree of induced astigmatism tends to wane over time; astigmatic keratotomy is an option in the setting of high degrees of residual astigmatism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12759836     DOI: 10.1076/soph.17.3.102.14776

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0882-0538            Impact factor:   1.975


  13 in total

1.  Comparison of clear corneal incision injuries between torsional and conventional phacoemulsification.

Authors:  Xu Chen; Yinghong Ji; Yi Lu
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Pivot concept: achieving a good-quality capsulorrhexis through a 2.2 mm or less clear corneal incision by using standard capsulorhexis forceps.

Authors:  Hung-Yuan Lin; Ya-Jung Chuang; Xin Tang; Chun-Chang Lin; Hsin-Yang Chen; Pi-Jung Lin
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Heat profiling of phacoemulsification tip using a thermal scanning camera.

Authors:  Wei Kiong Ngo; Louis W Lim; Colin S H Tan; Wee Jin Heng
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  An evaluation of intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of torsional mode versus longitudinal ultrasound mode phacoemulsification: a Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pia Leon; Ingrid Umari; Alessandro Mangogna; Andrea Zanei; Daniele Tognetto
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  A novel method to compare phacoemulsification parameters in vivo: two halves of one nucleus.

Authors:  Elena Tomilova; Sergey Shukhaev
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Investigation of scleral thermal injuries caused by ultrasonic pars plana phacoemulsification and aspiration using pig eyes.

Authors:  Takaki Sato; Toru Yasuhara; Masanori Fukumoto; Masashi Mimura; Takatoshi Kobayashi; Teruyo Kida; Shota Kojima; Hidehiro Oku; Tsunehiko Ikeda
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 2.031

7.  In water thermal imaging comparison of the Alcon legacy and AMO sovereign phacoemulsification systems.

Authors:  Kevin M Miller; Michael D Olson
Journal:  Open Ophthalmol J       Date:  2008-02-15

8.  A comparison of the efficacy of cataract surgery using Aqualase with phacoemulsification using MicroFlow system.

Authors:  Hyun-Wook Ryu; Shin-Hae Park; Choun-Ki Joo
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-09

9.  Torsional ultrasound modality for hard nucleus phacoemulsification cataract extraction.

Authors:  M Zeng; X Liu; Y Liu; Y Xia; L Luo; Z Yuan; Y Zeng; Y Liu
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Hydrogen prevents corneal endothelial damage in phacoemulsification cataract surgery.

Authors:  Tsutomu Igarashi; Ikuroh Ohsawa; Maika Kobayashi; Toru Igarashi; Hisaharu Suzuki; Masumi Iketani; Hiroshi Takahashi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.