Literature DB >> 12759322

Active neck muscle training in the treatment of chronic neck pain in women: a randomized controlled trial.

Jari Ylinen1, Esa-Pekka Takala, Matti Nykänen, Arja Häkkinen, Esko Mälkiä, Timo Pohjolainen, Sirkka-Liisa Karppi, Hannu Kautiainen, Olavi Airaksinen.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Active physical training is commonly recommended for patients with chronic neck pain; however, its efficacy has not been demonstrated in randomized studies.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of intensive isometric neck strength training and lighter endurance training of neck muscles on pain and disability in women with chronic, nonspecific neck pain.
DESIGN: Examiner-blinded randomized controlled trial conducted between February 2000 and March 2002.
SETTING: Participants were recruited from occupational health care systems in southern and eastern Finland. PATIENTS: A total of 180 female office workers between the ages of 25 and 53 years with chronic, nonspecific neck pain.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to either 2 training groups or to a control group, with 60 patients in each group. The endurance training group performed dynamic neck exercises, which included lifting the head up from the supine and prone positions. The strength training group performed high-intensity isometric neck strengthening and stabilization exercises with an elastic band. Both training groups performed dynamic exercises for the shoulders and upper extremities with dumbbells. All groups were advised to do aerobic and stretching exercises regularly 3 times a week. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Neck pain and disability were assessed by a visual analog scale, the neck and shoulder pain and disability index, and the Vernon neck disability index. Intermediate outcome measures included mood assessed by a short depression inventory and by maximal isometric neck strength and range of motion measures.
RESULTS: At the 12-month follow-up visit, both neck pain and disability had decreased in both training groups compared with the control group (P<.001). Maximal isometric neck strength had improved flexion by 110%, rotation by 76%, and extension by 69% in the strength training group. The respective improvements in the endurance training group were 28%, 29%, and 16% and in the control group were 10%, 10%, and 7%. Range of motion had also improved statistically significantly in both training groups compared with the control group in rotation, but only the strength training group had statistically significant improvements in lateral flexion and in flexion and extension.
CONCLUSIONS: Both strength and endurance training for 12 months were effective methods for decreasing pain and disability in women with chronic, nonspecific neck pain. Stretching and fitness training are commonly advised for patients with chronic neck pain, but stretching and aerobic exercising alone proved to be a much less effective form of training than strength training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12759322     DOI: 10.1001/jama.289.19.2509

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  77 in total

1.  Cervical muscle strength measurement in two groups of elite Greco-Roman and free style wrestlers and a group of non-athletic subjects.

Authors:  A Rezasoltani; A Ahmadi; M Nehzate-Khoshroh; F Forohideh; J Ylinen
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  Reliability and validity of measurements of cervical retraction strength obtained with a hand-held dynamometer.

Authors:  Frank Tudini; Bradley Myers; Richard Bohannon
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2019-03-18

3.  Adolescent flexibility, endurance strength, and physical activity as predictors of adult tension neck, low back pain, and knee injury: a 25 year follow up study.

Authors:  L O Mikkelsson; H Nupponen; J Kaprio; H Kautiainen; M Mikkelsson; U M Kujala
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 4.  [Exercise in migraine treatment. Review and discussion of clinical trials and implications for further trials].

Authors:  V Busch; C Gaul
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 5.  Cervical spondylosis and neck pain.

Authors:  Allan I Binder
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-03-10

Review 6.  A systematic review of measures used to assess chronic musculoskeletal pain in clinical and randomized controlled clinical trials.

Authors:  Leighann Litcher-Kelly; Sharon A Martino; Joan E Broderick; Arthur A Stone
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2007-08-09       Impact factor: 5.820

7.  Exercise prescription for chronic back or neck pain: who prescribes it? who gets it? What is prescribed?

Authors:  Janet K Freburger; Timothy S Carey; George M Holmes; Andrea S Wallace; Liana D Castel; Jane D Darter; Anne M Jackman
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2009-02-15

8.  Chronic Neck Pain and Cervicogenic Headaches.

Authors:  Frank L. Feng; Jerome Schofferman
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.598

9.  Development of a clinical prediction rule to identify patients with neck pain likely to benefit from cervical traction and exercise.

Authors:  Nicole H Raney; Evan J Petersen; Tracy A Smith; James E Cowan; Daniel G Rendeiro; Gail D Deyle; John D Childs
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 10.  Neck pain.

Authors:  Allan I Binder
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2008-08-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.