Literature DB >> 12757912

The neural response to emotional prosody, as revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Rachel L C Mitchell1, Rebecca Elliott, Martin Barry, Alan Cruttenden, Peter W R Woodruff.   

Abstract

Prosody is an important feature of language, comprising intonation, loudness, and tempo. Emotional prosodic processing forms an integral part of our social interactions. The main aim of this study was to use bold contrast fMRI to clarify the normal functional neuroanatomy of emotional prosody, in passive and active contexts. Subjects performed six separate scanning studies, within which two different conditions were contrasted: (1) "pure" emotional prosody versus rest; (2) congruent emotional prosody versus 'neutral' sentences; (3) congruent emotional prosody versus rest; (4) incongruent emotional prosody versus rest; (5) congruent versus incongruent emotional prosody; and (6) an active experiment in which subjects were instructed to either attend to the emotion conveyed by semantic content or that conveyed by tone of voice. Data resulting from these contrasts were analysed using SPM99. Passive listening to emotional prosody consistently activated the lateral temporal lobe (superior and/or middle temporal gyri). This temporal lobe response was relatively right-lateralised with or without semantic information. Both the separate and direct comparisons of congruent and incongruent emotional prosody revealed that subjects used fewer brain regions to process incongruent emotional prosody than congruent. The neural response to attention to semantics, was left lateralised, and recruited an extensive network not activated by attention to emotional prosody. Attention to emotional prosody modulated the response to speech, and induced right-lateralised activity, including the middle temporal gyrus. In confirming the results of lesion and neuropsychological studies, the current study emphasises the importance of the right hemisphere in the processing of emotional prosody, specifically the lateral temporal lobes.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12757912     DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(03)00017-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  75 in total

1.  Semantic Processing and Thought Disorder in Childhood-Onset Schizophrenia: Insights from fMRI.

Authors:  L A Borofsky; K McNealy; P Siddarth; K N Wu; M Dapretto; R Caplan
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.710

2.  Question/statement judgments: an fMRI study of intonation processing.

Authors:  Colin P Doherty; W Caroline West; Laura C Dilley; Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel; David Caplan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Level discrimination of speech sounds by hearing-impaired individuals with and without hearing amplification.

Authors:  William M Whitmer; Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Lexical and sentential processing in British Sign Language.

Authors:  Mairéad MacSweeney; Ruth Campbell; Bencie Woll; Michael J Brammer; Vincent Giampietro; Anthony S David; Gemma A Calvert; Philip K McGuire
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  A functional MRI study: cerebral laterality for lexical-semantic processing and human voice perception.

Authors:  M Koeda; H Takahashi; N Yahata; K Asai; Y Okubo; H Tanaka
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Does incongruence of lexicosemantic and prosodic information cause discernible cognitive conflict?

Authors:  Rachel L C Mitchell
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  The voice of emotion: an FMRI study of neural responses to angry and happy vocal expressions.

Authors:  Tom Johnstone; Carien M van Reekum; Terrence R Oakes; Richard J Davidson
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 8.  [Conception and realization of a prosody test. CI carrier in the focus of prosody research].

Authors:  J Mühlhaus; S Bartel-Friedrich
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.284

9.  Emotion modulates early auditory response to speech.

Authors:  Jade Wang; Trent Nicol; Erika Skoe; Mikko Sams; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Aberrant connectivity of areas for decoding degraded speech in patients with auditory verbal hallucinations.

Authors:  Mareike Clos; Kelly M J Diederen; Anne Lotte Meijering; Iris E Sommer; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.270

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.