Literature DB >> 12757558

Efficacy of donepezil on maintenance of activities of daily living in patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease and the effect on caregiver burden.

Howard Feldman1, Serge Gauthier, Jane Hecker, Bruno Vellas, Birol Emir, Vera Mastey, Ponni Subbiah.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the efficacy of donepezil treatment on activities of daily living (ADLs) and social functioning in patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease (AD) and the possible benefits of this treatment on caregiving time and stress levels.
DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multinational study.
SETTING: Patients resided in the community or in assisted living facilities who did not require skilled 24-hour nursing care. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred ninety patients with moderate to severe AD (baseline standardized Mini-Mental State Examination score of 5-17). INTERVENTION: Donepezil (5 mg/d for 4 weeks and 10 mg/d per clinician's judgment thereafter) or placebo for 24 weeks. MEASUREMENTS: ADLs were assessed using the Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD), the modified instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) scale (IADL+), and the modified Physical Self Maintenance Scale (PSMS+). Caregiver time spent assisting patients with basic and instrumental ADLs was recorded as part of the IADL+ and PSMS+ scales. Patients' social behavior was evaluated through the use of a caregiver diary that captured observations of patients' motivation, interactions, and engagement. Caregivers were evaluated for their levels of caregiver stress with a modified, multiple-item Caregiver Stress Scale (CSS). For each outcome measure, the mean change from baseline at Week 24 using a last observation carried forward (LOCF) analysis was calculated.
RESULTS: IADL+ and PSMS+ mean change from baseline scores for donepezil-treated patients showed a slower decline during the study than placebo-treated patients (Week 24 LOCF mean treatment differences: IADL+ = 6.83, P <.0001; PSMS+ = 1.32, P =.0015). Significant differences between the groups in favor of donepezil were observed on the DAD for instrumental and basic ADLs and on the three components required for the completion of each ADL: initiation, planning and organization, and effective performance. At baseline, caregivers of patients treated with donepezil (n = 141) did not differ significantly from caregivers of patients treated with placebo (n = 146) with respect to demographics or mean total scores on the CSS. At Week 24 LOCF, the overall distribution of caregiver ratings on each of the three caregiver diary items favored donepezil-treated patients over placebo-treated patients (P <.005). At Week 24 LOCF, mean change from baseline scores for CSS total and individual domain scores (all domains except caregiving competence, personal gain, and management of distress) were better for caregivers of donepezil-treated patients than for those of placebo-treated patients (CSS total, mean treatment difference = 1.82). Caregivers of donepezil-treated patients reported spending less time assisting with ADLs than caregivers of placebo-treated patients (mean difference = 52.4 min/d).
CONCLUSION: Donepezil demonstrated a significantly slower decline than placebo in instrumental and basic ADLs in these patients with moderate to severe AD. The ADL benefits in AD patients treated with donepezil were associated with less caregiving time and lower levels of caregiver stress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12757558     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2389.2003.51260.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  49 in total

1.  Differences in resource use and costs of dementia care between European countries: baseline data from the ICTUS study.

Authors:  A Gustavsson; L Jonsson; T Rapp; E Reynish; P J Ousset; S Andrieu; C Cantet; B Winblad; B Vellas; A Wimo
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.075

2.  The art of sharing the diagnosis and management of Alzheimer's disease with patients and caregivers: recommendations of an expert consensus panel.

Authors:  George T Grossberg; Daniel D Christensen; Patrick A Griffith; Diana R Kerwin; Gail Hunt; Eric J Hall
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2010

3.  Development of identification of the central sulcus in brain magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Norio Hayashi; Keita Sakuta; Kaori Minehiro; Masako Takanaga; Shigeru Sanada; Masayuki Suzuki; Tosiaki Miyati; Tomoyuki Yamamoto; Osamu Matsui
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2010-09-29

Review 4.  The cholinergic system in the pathophysiology and treatment of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Harald Hampel; M-Marsel Mesulam; A Claudio Cuello; Martin R Farlow; Ezio Giacobini; George T Grossberg; Ara S Khachaturian; Andrea Vergallo; Enrica Cavedo; Peter J Snyder; Zaven S Khachaturian
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 5.  Impact of rivastigmine on caregiver burden associated with Alzheimer's disease in both informal care and nursing home settings.

Authors:  George T Grossberg
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.923

6.  Effect of prescription drug coverage on health of the elderly.

Authors:  Nasreen Khan; Robert Kaestner; Swu-Jane Lin
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  A systematic review of assessment and treatment of moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Frederick A Schmitt; Christine H Wichems
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2006

Review 8.  Pharmacoeconomics of cholinesterase inhibitors in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Linus Jönsson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  Current therapeutic options for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Alberto Lleó
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.236

Review 10.  Economic considerations in the management of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Carolyn W Zhu; Mary Sano
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.458

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.