Literature DB >> 12757275

It's the prices, stupid: why the United States is so different from other countries.

Gerard F Anderson1, Uwe E Reinhardt, Peter S Hussey, Varduhi Petrosyan.   

Abstract

This paper uses the latest data from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) to compare the health systems of the thirty member countries in 2000. Total health spending--the distribution of public and private health spending in the OECD countries--is presented and discussed. U.S. public spending as a percentage of GDP (5.8 percent) is virtually identical to public spending in the United Kingdom, Italy, and Japan (5.9 percent each) and not much smaller than in Canada (6.5 percent). The paper also compares pharmaceutical spending, health system capacity, and use of medical services. The data show that the United States spends more on health care than any other country. However, on most measures of health services use, the United States is below the OECD median. These facts suggest that the difference in spending is caused mostly by higher prices for health care goods and services in the United States.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12757275     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.22.3.89

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  74 in total

1.  Generational differences in U.S. public spending, 1980-2000.

Authors:  Susmita Pati; Ron Keren; Evaline A Alessandrini; Donald F Schwarz
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Who will have health insurance in the future? An updated projection.

Authors:  Richard A Young; Jennifer E DeVoe
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 3.  From HMOs to ACOs: the quest for the Holy Grail in U.S. health policy.

Authors:  Theodore Marmor; Jonathan Oberlander
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  Broadening the base of publicly funded health care.

Authors:  Irfan A Dhalla; Gordon H Guyatt; Mark Stabile; Ahmed M Bayoumi
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  One Nation, Underinsured.

Authors:  Sara Rosenbaum
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.911

Review 6.  Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

Authors:  Benjamin B Albright; Tilman Witte; Alena N Tofte; Jeremy Chou; Jonathan D Black; Vrunda B Desai; Elisabeth A Erekson
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 4.137

7.  Is the United States an outlier in health care and health outcomes? A preliminary analysis.

Authors:  William S Comanor; H E Frech; Richard D Miller
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2006-03

8.  Ethics and evidence-based medicine: is there a conflict?

Authors:  Erich H Loewy
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2007-08-06

9.  Waste in the U.S. Health care system: a conceptual framework.

Authors:  Tanya G K Bentley; Rachel M Effros; Kartika Palar; Emmett B Keeler
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.911

10.  Markets and medical care: the United States, 1993-2005.

Authors:  Joseph White
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.911

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.