Literature DB >> 12754534

Door to needle time in administering thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction.

Abdullah A Abba1, Bashir A Wani, Rehan A Rahmatullah, Mohamed Z Khalil, Abubakar M Kumo, Mohammed A Ghonaim.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Thrombolytic therapy is a standard treatment for patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction (MI). Early administration of these agents is crucial for the outcome of management. This audit was conducted to evaluate the time between arrival to emergency department (ED) and the administration of thrombolysis (door to needle time).
METHODS: Data was collected from patients admitted to the Coronary Care Unit of Riyadh Medical Complex (RMC), Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, a 1500-bed community hospital, with a diagnosis of acute MI and received thrombolytic therapy over a one-year period (April 1999 to April 2000). The time between arrival to the ED to the time of administration of thrombolytic therapy was obtained as well as the time of onset of chest pain up to presentation to the hospital, and the outcome (all cause mortality) post treatment.
RESULTS: A total of 271 patients (256 males) admitted to RMC with a diagnosis of acute MI received thrombolytic therapy over a one-year duration. The median door to needle time was 95 minutes. The median time of onset of chest pain to arrival to ED was 5 hours (300 minutes). The outcome of these patients obtained either alive was 260 (96%) or dead was 11 (4%) (P < 0.00001).
CONCLUSION: The door to needle time was relatively similar to other centers. The delay in administering thrombolytic therapy should be reduced to a target of <70 minutes from onset of symptoms. Delay in presentation to the hospital was more important and factors contributing to this delay should be looked for and corrected. Another audit is needed to evaluate the implementation of these recommendations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12754534

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Saudi Med J        ISSN: 0379-5284            Impact factor:   1.484


  5 in total

1.  Evaluation of fibrinolytic medical therapy for patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Ali Maleki; Arman Shariari; Masoumeh Sadeghi; Negin Rashidi; Farshid Alyari; Saeid Forughi; Behjat Nabatchi; Reza Ghanavati
Journal:  ARYA Atheroscler       Date:  2012

2.  Reduction in Door-to-Needle Time after Transfer of Thrombolysis Site from CCU to Emergency Department.

Authors:  Osama Mohammed; Firjith C Paramba; Naushad V Aboobaker; Riyadh A Mohammed; Nishan K Purayil; Haitham M Jassim; Mohammad K Shariff; Saud M Aslam; Farook F Muhsen; Khalid H Al Noor; Hani H Al Kilani
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 1.112

3.  Gender differences in in-hospital mortality and mechanisms of death after the first acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Damir Fabijanic; Viktor Culic; Ivo Bozic; Dinko Miric; Sanda Stojanovic Stipic; Mislav Radic; Zoran Vucinovic
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.526

4.  Impact of Delayed Pain to Needle and Variable Door to Needle Time On In-Hospital Complications in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Who Underwent Thrombolysis: A Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Arshad Muhammad Iqbal; Syed Farrukh Jamal; Adnan Ahmed; Hassan Khan; Waqar Khan; Faisal Ahmed; Ramchandani Santosh; Muhammad Salman Ghazni; Ateeq Mubarik; Bashir Hanif
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-01-13

5.  Fibrinolytic Therapy in CCU Instead of Emergency Ward: How It Affects Door to Needle Time?

Authors:  Fatemeh Zeraati; Shahram Homayounfar; Farzaneh Esna-Ashari; Marzieh Khalili
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2014-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.