Literature DB >> 12754062

Sonographic evaluation of the size of Achilles tendon: the effect of exercise and dominance of the ankle.

Michael Ying1, Emmy Yeung, Brian Li, Winnie Li, Mandy Lui, Chi-Wai Tsoi.   

Abstract

This study was undertaken to measure and compare the thickness and cross-sectional area of the Achilles tendon between frequent- and infrequent-exercise subjects, and between the dominant and nondominant ankles in an asymptomatic Chinese population. Interobserver variability in the measurement of the size of Achilles tendon was also evaluated. High-resolution ultrasound (US) examination of Achilles tendons was performed in 40 healthy subjects (20 who frequently exercised, had exercise at least 3 days per week and at least 2 h per session; and 20 who infrequently exercised); their age range was 19 to 25 years. The thickness and cross-sectional area of the Achilles tendons were measured in a transverse scan at the level of medial malleolus. For each subject, the Achilles tendons were measured by five operators to evaluate the interobserver variability in the measurements. The mean thickness and cross-sectional areas of the Achilles tendon in a healthy Chinese population are 5.23 mm(2) and 56.91 mm(2)(2), respectively. The mean thickness of the Achilles tendon of frequent-exercise subjects (dominant ankle 5.43 mm, nondominant ankle 5.38 mm) was significantly greater than that of infrequent-exercise subjects (dominant ankle 5.08 mm, nondominant ankle 5.04 mm) (p < 0.05). The cross-sectional area of the tendons was also larger in frequent-exercise subjects but, whereas a significant result was found in dominant ankles (frequent-exercise subjects 60.46 mm(2)(2), infrequent-exercise subjects 54.71 mm(2)(2)) (p < 0.05), this was not the case for the nondominant ankles (frequent-exercise subjects 57.09 mm(2)(2), infrequent-exercise subjects 55.4 mm(2)(2)) (p > 0.05). In both frequent- and infrequent-exercise subjects, there was no significant difference in the mean thickness and cross-sectional area of Achilles tendon between dominant and nondominant ankles (p > 0.05). There was a high reproducibility in the sonographic measurement of the thickness (68%) and cross-sectional area (81%) of Achilles tendons. Results suggested that exercise would cause increase in the thickness and cross-sectional area of Achilles tendon. Interobserver variability is not significant in the sonographic measurement of Achilles tendons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12754062     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-5629(03)00008-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  25 in total

1.  Ultrasound assessment of tendons in asymptomatic volunteers: a study of reproducibility.

Authors:  Philip J O'Connor; Andrew J Grainger; S R Morgan; K L Smith; J C Waterton; A F P Nash
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-08-12       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Effects of plyometric training on both active and passive parts of the plantarflexors series elastic component stiffness of muscle-tendon complex.

Authors:  Alexandre Fouré; Antoine Nordez; Peter McNair; Christophe Cornu
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Does achilles tendon cross sectional area differ after downhill, level and uphill running in trained runners?

Authors:  Katy Andrews Neves; A Wayne Johnson; Iain Hunter; J William Myrer
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  Achilles tendon elastic properties remain decreased in long term after rupture.

Authors:  B Frankewycz; A Penz; J Weber; N P da Silva; F Freimoser; R Bell; M Nerlich; E M Jung; D Docheva; C G Pfeifer
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Ultrasound of the joints and entheses in healthy children.

Authors:  Nancy A Chauvin; Victor Ho-Fung; Diego Jaramillo; J Christopher Edgar; Pamela F Weiss
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-03-06

6.  Real-time sonoelastography using an external reference material: test-retest reliability of healthy Achilles tendons.

Authors:  Alessandro Schneebeli; Filippo Del Grande; Gabriele Vincenzo; Corrado Cescon; Ron Clijsen; Fulvio Biordi; Marco Barbero
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 7.  Pathogenesis of tendinopathies: inflammation or degeneration?

Authors:  Michele Abate; Karin Gravare Silbernagel; Carl Siljeholm; Angelo Di Iorio; Daniele De Amicis; Vincenzo Salini; Suzanne Werner; Roberto Paganelli
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 5.156

8.  Overload and neovascularization of Achilles tendons in young artistic and rhythmic gymnasts compared with controls: an observational study.

Authors:  A Notarnicola; G Maccagnano; M Di Leo; S Tafuri; B Moretti
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2013-05-29

Review 9.  Longitudinal microvascularity in Achilles tendinopathy (power Doppler ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging time-intensity curves and the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Achilles questionnaire): a pilot study.

Authors:  Paula J Richards; Iain W McCall; Christopher Day; John Belcher; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Structural changes in loaded equine tendons can be monitored by a novel spectroscopic technique.

Authors:  Oksana Kostyuk; Helen L Birch; Vivek Mudera; Robert A Brown
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-10-24       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.