OBJECTIVE: In the present study, the effectiveness of endovascular stent grafts (ESG) in the treatment of acute aortic complications, such as acute dissection type B, penetrating ulcer and traumatic aortic rupture is evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From June 1997 to February 2002, 66 patients were treated with ESG. Out of this cohort, 19 patients (28.8%) were subjected to stent grafting due to acute aortic syndromes. Acute dissection type B was present in 11 patients (16.6%), a penetrating ulcer was diagnosed in six patients (9%) and in 2 patients (3%) a traumatic aneurysm was the indication for operation. There were 16 male and three female patients with a mean age of 60 years (20-85 years). Excluder stent grafts (Gore) were used in 15 patients, the Talent device (Medtronic) was implanted in four patients. RESULTS: Stent graft placement was technically successful in all patients. Hospital mortality was 0%. Paraparesis occurred in one patient (5.2%), which could be managed successfully without remaining neurological deficit after installation of cerebrospinal fluid drainage for 72h. In another patient, overstenting of the left subclavian artery caused ischemia of the left arm and left subclavian to carotid artery bypass had to be performed. ICU-stay ranged from 1 to 6 days (mean 2.4 days) and the patients could be discharged after an average hospital stay of 8 days. In the follow-up period, one patient died due to myocardial infarction and one patient had to be re-operated due to contained rupture of the thoracic aorta caused by an endoleak. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that endovascular stent grafting is an excellent and effective treatment modality for the acute aortic accident, which can be recommended for high-risk patients too. However, close follow-up examination is indicated and long-term results have to be awaited to evaluate the real effectiveness of this method.
OBJECTIVE: In the present study, the effectiveness of endovascular stent grafts (ESG) in the treatment of acute aortic complications, such as acute dissection type B, penetrating ulcer and traumatic aortic rupture is evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From June 1997 to February 2002, 66 patients were treated with ESG. Out of this cohort, 19 patients (28.8%) were subjected to stent grafting due to acute aortic syndromes. Acute dissection type B was present in 11 patients (16.6%), a penetrating ulcer was diagnosed in six patients (9%) and in 2 patients (3%) a traumatic aneurysm was the indication for operation. There were 16 male and three female patients with a mean age of 60 years (20-85 years). Excluder stent grafts (Gore) were used in 15 patients, the Talent device (Medtronic) was implanted in four patients. RESULTS: Stent graft placement was technically successful in all patients. Hospital mortality was 0%. Paraparesis occurred in one patient (5.2%), which could be managed successfully without remaining neurological deficit after installation of cerebrospinal fluid drainage for 72h. In another patient, overstenting of the left subclavian artery caused ischemia of the left arm and left subclavian to carotid artery bypass had to be performed. ICU-stay ranged from 1 to 6 days (mean 2.4 days) and the patients could be discharged after an average hospital stay of 8 days. In the follow-up period, one patient died due to myocardial infarction and one patient had to be re-operated due to contained rupture of the thoracic aorta caused by an endoleak. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that endovascular stent grafting is an excellent and effective treatment modality for the acute aortic accident, which can be recommended for high-risk patients too. However, close follow-up examination is indicated and long-term results have to be awaited to evaluate the real effectiveness of this method.