Literature DB >> 12753690

Peritoneal dialysis underutilization: the impact of an interventional nephrology peritoneal dialysis access program.

Arif Asif1, Patricia Byers, Florin Gadalean, David Roth.   

Abstract

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an underutilized form of renal replacement therapy. Recent data have emphasized that only 12% of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients are initiated on this form of therapy in the United States. Patients requiring PD have most often been referred to general surgeons for catheter placement. This has incurred additional delays in starting treatment and loss of decision-making control by the referring nephrologist. To address this issue, we developed and incorporated our own PD access placement program into the preexisting chronic kidney disease (CKD) education program. To date, 46 patients have undergone 71 procedures. These included 51 (72%) PD catheter insertions, 14 (20%) removals, and 6 (8%) repositioning procedures for poor drainage. PD catheter insertion was performed peritoneoscopically under local anesthesia and a Fogarty catheter was used to reposition a migrated catheter. All of the procedures were performed by nephrologists in a dedicated interventional nephrology (IN) laboratory. All six repositioning procedures failed to restore optimal drainage. Five of these patients had the catheter removed and a new catheter placed during the same procedure. Of these five patients, one had recurrence of poor drainage and opted for hemodialysis (HD). The sixth patient declined reinsertion and chose HD. Of the remaining seven removal procedures, three were due to fungal peritonitis, one due to bowel perforation, one due to severe depression, one due to transplant, and one catheter was removed at the request of the primary physician in a terminally ill patient. Eight of the 51 catheter insertions were during the initial admission of a catastrophic dialysis start. Two of these patients started acute PD and avoided catheter placement for HD. Thirty-seven of 46 patients have a functional PD catheter with a follow-up of 8.6 +/- 0.8 (mean +/- SE) months. During an 18-month period our PD population has increased from 43 to 80 patients. We conclude that a dedicated PD access placement program coupled with a CKD education program can have a dramatic impact on patient choice and PD growth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12753690     DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-139x.2003.16051.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Dial        ISSN: 0894-0959            Impact factor:   3.455


  13 in total

1.  Impact of the inclusion of a nephrologist on the surgical team for peritoneal catheter insertion.

Authors:  Yoshinori Taro; Akihiro Yoshimoto; Mutsushi Kawakita; Hiroshi Ueta; Naohiro Toda; Noriaki Utsunomiya; Koei Muguruma; Takehiko Segawa; Takao Suzuki
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.756

2.  A comparative analysis of percutaneous and open surgical techniques for peritoneal catheter placement.

Authors:  Samar Medani; Mohamed Shantier; Wael Hussein; Catherine Wall; George Mellotte
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 1.756

3.  A novel technique for repositioning, under local anesthetic, malfunctioning and migrated peritoneal dialysis catheters.

Authors:  Pantelis Sarafidis; Elaine Bowes; Adam Rumjon; Behzad Ansari; Hugh Cairns
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.756

4.  Performance of procedures by nephrologists and nephrology fellows at U.S. nephrology training programs.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Berns; W Charles O'Neill
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 8.237

5.  Outcomes of nephrologist-inserted peritoneal catheters in indigenous patients from Far North Queensland.

Authors:  Yeoungjee Cho; Richard Baer; John P Killen; Murty Mantha
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.756

6.  Different outcomes of peritoneal catheter percutaneous placement by nephrologists using a trocar versus the Seldinger technique: the experience of two Brazilian centers.

Authors:  Daniela Ponce; Vanessa B Banin; Tricya Nunes Bueloni; Pasqual Barretti; Jacqueline Caramori; André Luís Balbi
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 7.  Setting Up and Expanding a Home Dialysis Program: Is There a Recipe for Success?

Authors:  Masood Ahmad; Eric L Wallace; Gaurav Jain
Journal:  Kidney360       Date:  2020-05-01

8.  Comparison of Percutaneous and Open Surgical Techniques for First-Time Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Placement in the Unbreached Peritoneum.

Authors:  Samar Medani; Wael Hussein; Mohamed Shantier; Robert Flynn; Catherine Wall; George Mellotte
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 1.756

9.  Geographic and facility-level variation in the use of peritoneal dialysis in Canada: a cohort study.

Authors:  Manish M Sood; Navdeep Tangri; Brett Hiebert; Joanne Kappel; Allison Dart; Adeera Levin; Braden Manns; Anita Molzahn; David Naimark; Sharon J Nessim; Claudio Rigatto; Steven D Soroka; Michael Zappitelli; Paul Komenda
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2014-03-27

10.  The choice of peritoneal dialysis catheter implantation technique by nephrologists.

Authors:  T Yip; S L Lui; W K Lo
Journal:  Int J Nephrol       Date:  2013-01-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.